Implications of sand mobilization on stability and rheological properties of carbon dioxide foam and its transport mechanism in unconsolidated sandstone. (15th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Singh, Alpana; Sharma, Tushar
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 263:Part B(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-01-15
• Subjects: Carbon storage -- Foam -- Oil recovery -- Rheology -- Viscosity -- Sandstones; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125772
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: This study reports the role of sand grain (of varying size: 60–380 μm and concentration: 0–3 wt%) on stability and properties of Pickering carbon dioxide (CO2 ) foam, which relates to foam transport problem during oil recovery practice in unconsolidated formation. For foams, anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate: 0.2 wt%) and single-step silica nanofluid (0.1 wt%, size: 33–38 nm) were used and Pickering foams were prepared by mechanical agitation in the presence of different sand (comprised mainly of quartz with traces of clay), to mimic the effect of grain on foam stability. Interestingly, a varying stability exists in presence of sand. Thus, foam volume increased from 48 ml (without sand) to 58 ml when 1 wt% sand (of size ≈ 60–120 μm) was added while it further reduced to 46 and 40 ml with 2 and 3 wt% sand, respectively. On the contrary, foam stability continuously reduced with increment in sand size (from 60 to 120 to 200–380 μm), indicating unfavorable role of sand size on foam stability. Thus, sand production during oil recovery process is unfavorable for the stability of foam systems. The effect of sand concentration and size on foam properties was validated by interfacial tension and rheological measurements. Interfacial tension between CO2 -nanofluid decreased till 1 wt% sand, suggesting favorable role of sand on CO2 -nanofluid interaction. Similarly, CO2 foam showed maximum viscosity (72.8 mPa s) at 1 wt% sand (of size ≈ 60–120 μm) while further increase in concentration (>1 wt%) and size (>120 μm) reduced foam viscosity. These foams also exhibited viscoelastic characteristics with presence of both storage and viscous moduli. The solid-like nature of foam was least affected by the increase in deformational strain and foams exhibited dominating storage modulus over the range strain explored. Thus, the observation of this study can be used to optimize foam flooding in sandstone reservoirs which exhibit sand/fines production. Graphical abstract: Effect of sand on foam-ability and stability of Pickering CO2 foams. Image 1 Highlights: Foam flooding for carbon utilization in unconsolidated sandstone was explored. Sand of an optimum size and concentration offered higher stability in Pickering foam. Increase in sand size and concentration suggested poor foaming characteristics. The solid-like nature of CO2 foam changed to liquid-like at high sand concentration. Size: 60–120 μm and concentration: 1 wt% offered most stable viscoelastic behavior.