2022-RA-905-ESGO Mismatch repair deficiency is not applicable as biomarker in cervical cancer, yet MSH-2 has strong prognostic value. (20th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van den Berg, Madeleine Charlotte; Berg, Hege Fredriksen; Stokowy, Thomas; Hoivik, Erling; Woie, Kathrine; Engerud, Hilde; Ojesina, Akinyemi I; Salvesen Haldorsen, Ingfrid Helene; Bertelsen, Bjørn Inge; Trovik, Jone; Halle, Mari Kyllesø; Krakstad, Camilla
• Is Part Of: International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 32(2022)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A32
• Page End: A32
• Publication Date: 2022-10-20
• Subjects: Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99465
• DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.68
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1048-891X

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction/Background: Although early detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency has surfaced as a predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor responses in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the incidence of MMR deficiency and establish its prognostic significance as well as the value of separate MMR proteins in cervical cancer. Methodology: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in a prospectively collected, population-based cervical cancer cohort of 508 patients with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Staining was scored as either negative or positive and was further defined by the staining index (SI), consisting of area and intensity of staining varying from 1–9. MMR deficiency was defined as negative expression in one or more of the proteins. Also, gene set enrichment analyses were performed and differentially expressed or mutated genes were identified, across the RNA and whole-exome sequencing cohorts (n=72 and n=75, respectively), consisting of data obtained from fresh tissue. Results: Eight tumours (1.5%) were MMR deficient, four of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not independently correlate with survival when adjusted for histologic type (HR 1.93, p=0.222). Low MSH-2 (SI ≤4, n=48) associated with poor survival (HR: 1.94 p=0.02), also when corrected for tumour stage, type and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). Furthermore, the MSH-2 low tumours associated with high tumour mutational burden (p=0.003) and a high frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.001). Conclusion: MMR deficiency is rare in cervical cancer and exhibits no independent relationship to survival in the current study. Low MSH-2 level is an independent prognostic marker for poor survival in cervical cancer.