2022-RA-619-ESGO Less is more? Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in FIGO 2018 stage IA2 cervical carcinoma: a pan-birmingham gynaecological cancer centre population-based longitudinal cohort study. (20th October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 2022-RA-619-ESGO Less is more? Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in FIGO 2018 stage IA2 cervical carcinoma: a pan-birmingham gynaecological cancer centre population-based longitudinal cohort study. (20th October 2022)
- Main Title:
- 2022-RA-619-ESGO Less is more? Simple hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy in FIGO 2018 stage IA2 cervical carcinoma: a pan-birmingham gynaecological cancer centre population-based longitudinal cohort study
- Authors:
- Audrey Kwong, Fong Lien
Tranoulis, Anastasios
Yap, Jason
Elattar, Ahmed
Singh, Kavita
Balega, Janos - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction/Background: To compare post-operative morbidity and long-term survival outcomes of simple hysterectomy (SH) versus radical hysterectomy (RH) in FIGO 2018 stage IA2 cervical cancer (CC). Methodology: Using the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre database, we identified women with stage IA2 CC between 2008 and 2020. Clinicopathological and treatment data were collated, and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysed via the Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test and Cox regression. Post-operative complications were assessed via the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Of the 46 women enrolled, 28 (60.7%) underwent SH and 18 (29.3%) RH. There was no significant difference in age, BMI, parity or ethnicity between the two groups. For SH vs RH, 78.6% vs 38.9% ( p-value =0.01 had disease of squamous histology, 96.4% vs 94.4% ( p-value =0.74) underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone prior to surgery, 7.14% vs 44.4% ( p-value =0.003) had grade 3 disease, 71.4% vs 77.8% ( p-value =0.22) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 3.8% vs 5.6% ( p-value =0.12) had severe (CD>3) post-operative complications. Women with adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma (OR=1.6, p-value =0.01) or grade 3 disease (OR=21.02, p-value =0.0004) were more likely to undergo RH. One recurrence was observed in each group. The mean PFS in SH vs RH group was 139.44 vs 159.00 months. SH was not associated with shorter PFS in either univariate (HR=0.59,Abstract : Introduction/Background: To compare post-operative morbidity and long-term survival outcomes of simple hysterectomy (SH) versus radical hysterectomy (RH) in FIGO 2018 stage IA2 cervical cancer (CC). Methodology: Using the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre database, we identified women with stage IA2 CC between 2008 and 2020. Clinicopathological and treatment data were collated, and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysed via the Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test and Cox regression. Post-operative complications were assessed via the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Of the 46 women enrolled, 28 (60.7%) underwent SH and 18 (29.3%) RH. There was no significant difference in age, BMI, parity or ethnicity between the two groups. For SH vs RH, 78.6% vs 38.9% ( p-value =0.01 had disease of squamous histology, 96.4% vs 94.4% ( p-value =0.74) underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone prior to surgery, 7.14% vs 44.4% ( p-value =0.003) had grade 3 disease, 71.4% vs 77.8% ( p-value =0.22) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 3.8% vs 5.6% ( p-value =0.12) had severe (CD>3) post-operative complications. Women with adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma (OR=1.6, p-value =0.01) or grade 3 disease (OR=21.02, p-value =0.0004) were more likely to undergo RH. One recurrence was observed in each group. The mean PFS in SH vs RH group was 139.44 vs 159.00 months. SH was not associated with shorter PFS in either univariate (HR=0.59, p-value =0.72) or multivariate analysis (aHR=0.24, p-value =0.36). One death was observed in the RH group. The mean OS in SH vs RH group was 139.44 vs 153.85 months ( p-value =0.51). Conclusion: SH does not smilingly associated with poorer oncological outcomes in stage IA2 CC. This evidence is in line with previous observational studies. The results of randomised SHAPE trial are being awaited to draw firmer conclusions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 32(2022)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- International journal of gynecological cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 32(2022)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0032-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A17
- Page End:
- A17
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-20
- Subjects:
- Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99465 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ijgc/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118544021/toc ↗
https://ijgc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.36 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1048-891X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24561.xml