QLTI-09. DEFINING GLOBAL BENCHMARK OUTCOMES FOR TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY OF PITUITARY ADENOMAS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF 2862 CASES. (14th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- QLTI-09. DEFINING GLOBAL BENCHMARK OUTCOMES FOR TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY OF PITUITARY ADENOMAS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF 2862 CASES. (14th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- QLTI-09. DEFINING GLOBAL BENCHMARK OUTCOMES FOR TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY OF PITUITARY ADENOMAS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF 2862 CASES
- Authors:
- Drexler, Richard
Rotermund, Roman
Smith, Timothy
Kilgallon, John
Honegger, Jürgen
Nasi-Kordhishti, Isabella
Gardner, Paul
Gersey, Zachary
Abdallah, Hussein
Jane, John
Marino, Alexandria
Knappe, Ulrich
Uksul, Nesrin
Rzaev, Jamil
Galushko, Evgeniy
Gormolysova, Ekaterina
Bervitskiy, Anatoliy
Schroeder, Henry
Eördögh, Márton
Losa, Marco
Mortini, Pietro
Gerlach, Rüdiger
Azab, Mohammed
Budohoski, Karol
Rennert, Robert
Karsy, Michael
Couldwell, William
Antunes, Apio
Flitsch, Jörg
Ricklefs, Franz - Abstract:
- Abstract: Benchmarks are important to measure and aid in improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, best achievable results that have been validated internationally for transsphenoidal surgery are not available. Therefore, we aimed to establish robust, standardized outcome benchmarks for transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary adenomas. A total of 2862 transsphenoidal tumor resections from 12 high-volume centers in 4 continents were analyzed. Patients were risk stratified and the median values of each center's outcomes were established. The outcome benchmark was defined as the 75 th percentile of all median values for a particular outcome as defined by Staiger et al. Out of 2862 patients, 1201 (41.9%) defined the benchmark cohort. The proportion of benchmark cases contributing to the final cohort ranged across centers between 22.1% to 59.7%. Within the benchmark cases, 928 (73.3%) patients underwent microscopic (MTS) and 263 (21.9%) patients endoscopic endonasal resection (EES). The overall postoperative complication rate was 18.9% with an in-hospital mortality between 0.0-0.8%. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤ 3.3% for reoperation rate, ≤ 4.6% for cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention, and ≤ 15.3% for transient diabetes insipidus. At 6 months follow-up, benchmark cutoffs were calculated as follows: readmission rate: ≤ 7.1%, new hypopituitarism ≤ 15.5%, new neurological deficit ≤ 1.2%, tumor remnant ≤ 25.5%. This analysis defines benchmark values for transsphenoidalAbstract: Benchmarks are important to measure and aid in improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, best achievable results that have been validated internationally for transsphenoidal surgery are not available. Therefore, we aimed to establish robust, standardized outcome benchmarks for transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary adenomas. A total of 2862 transsphenoidal tumor resections from 12 high-volume centers in 4 continents were analyzed. Patients were risk stratified and the median values of each center's outcomes were established. The outcome benchmark was defined as the 75 th percentile of all median values for a particular outcome as defined by Staiger et al. Out of 2862 patients, 1201 (41.9%) defined the benchmark cohort. The proportion of benchmark cases contributing to the final cohort ranged across centers between 22.1% to 59.7%. Within the benchmark cases, 928 (73.3%) patients underwent microscopic (MTS) and 263 (21.9%) patients endoscopic endonasal resection (EES). The overall postoperative complication rate was 18.9% with an in-hospital mortality between 0.0-0.8%. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤ 3.3% for reoperation rate, ≤ 4.6% for cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention, and ≤ 15.3% for transient diabetes insipidus. At 6 months follow-up, benchmark cutoffs were calculated as follows: readmission rate: ≤ 7.1%, new hypopituitarism ≤ 15.5%, new neurological deficit ≤ 1.2%, tumor remnant ≤ 25.5%. This analysis defines benchmark values for transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas targeting morbidity, mortality, surgical and tumor-related outcomes. The benchmark cutoffs can be used to assess different centers, patients' populations, and novel surgical techniques. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 24(2022)Supplement 7
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 24(2022)Supplement 7
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 7 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0024-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- vii236
- Page End:
- vii236
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-14
- Subjects:
- Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.911 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24558.xml