NIMG-106. WHAT'S BEHIND TSPO PET LABELLING: DIGGING FOR THE HISTOLOGICAL, CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR CORRELATES. (14th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weidner, Lorraine; Lorenz, Julia; Dekorsy, Franziska; Quach, Stefanie; Ruf, Victoria; Bartos, Laura; Hau, Peter; Tonn, Joerg-Christian; Bartenstein, Peter; von Baumgarten, Louisa; Brendel, Matthias; Albert, Nathalie; Riemenschneider, Markus
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 24(2022)Supplement 7
• Page Start: vii189
• Page End: vii190
• Publication Date: 2022-11-14
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.724
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: TSPO is frequently upregulated in glioblastoma. Despite its use as an imaging biomarker for PET in glioma, the interpretation is challenging due to the heterogeneity of cell populations that could contribute to the TSPO-PET signal. We therefore dissected TSPO labelling in connection with the underlying histopathological and molecular features in biopsy samples from glioma patients. Comparing regions of high and low TSPO-PET signal in 58 patients, we assessed TSPO protein expression and expression of cell differentiation markers by use of immunohistochemistry on consecutive sections and by multiplex stains. Our results suggest that apart from microglia and macrophages the glial tumor cells relevantly contribute to the overall TSPO signal in glioma patients. To identify hallmarks and GO terms associated with TSPO labelling/expression we next performed RNAseq in 33 patients. Using DESeq2 followed by FUMA and Reactome as well as GSEA with normalized counts, we identified three TSPO-dependent functional clusters, i.e. apoptosis/DNA repair, extracellular matrix organization and immune system. On the DNA level, we analyzed the TSPO promoter by direct bisulfite sequencing suggesting that a loss of TSPO methylation may mechanistically contribute to the TSPO overexpression observed in high-grade gliomas. Exceeding our investigations on glioma biopsies we stained tissue microarrays (130 individuals) for TSPO that cover a broader spectrum of both human brain pathologies (13 different entities) and non-neoplastic tissues (14 different brain regions). We here found a high degree of heterogeneity of TSPO expression between entities and regions. Merging this information with TSPO-PETs from respective patients/brain regions allows to generate a map of TSPO expression in healthy and diseased brain for clinical use. Altogether, our approach of integrating histological, molecular and imaging data will provide unique insights into TSPO-PET enrichment patterns which may help to better understand and to comprehensively describe the clinical relevance of this novel imaging biomarker.