Semi-parametric learning for visual odometry. (April 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guizilini, Vitor; Ramos, Fabio
• Is Part Of: International journal of robotics research. Volume 32:Number 5(2013)
• Page Start: 526
• Page End: 546
• Publication Date: 2013-04
• Subjects: localization -- Gaussian Processes -- visual odometry -- field robotics; Robots -- Periodicals; Robots, Industrial -- Periodicals; 629.89205
• DOI: 10.1177/0278364912472245
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-3649

Abstract

This paper addresses the visual odometry problem from a machine learning perspective. Optical flow information from a single camera is used as input for a multiple-output Gaussian process (MOGP) framework, that estimates linear and angular camera velocities. This approach has several benefits. (1) It substitutes the need for conventional camera calibration, by introducing a semi-parametric model that is able to capture nuances that a strictly parametric geometric model struggles with. (2) It is able to recover absolute scale if a range sensor (e.g. a laser scanner) is used for ground-truth, provided that training and testing data share a certain similarity. (3) It is naturally able to provide measurement uncertainties. We extend the standard MOGP framework to include the ability to infer joint estimates (full covariance matrices) for both translation and rotation, taking advantage of the fact that all estimates are correlated since they are derived from the same vehicle. We also modify the common zero mean assumption of a Gaussian process to accommodate a standard geometric model of the camera, thus providing an initial estimate that is then further refined by the non-parametric model. Both Gaussian process hyperparameters and camera parameters are trained simultaneously, so there is still no need for traditional camera calibration, although if these values are known they can be used to speed up training. This approach has been tested in a wide variety of situations, both 2D in urban and off-road environments (two degrees of freedom) and 3D with unmanned aerial vehicles (six degrees of freedom), with results that are comparable to standard state-of-the-art visual odometry algorithms and even more traditional methods, such as wheel encoders and laser-based Iterative Closest Point. We also test its limits to generalize over environment changes by varying training and testing conditions independently, and also by changing cameras between training and testing.