A Text Mining Analysis of US-Chinese Leaders on Trade Policy. Issue 3 (30th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Jun Yeop; Lee, Juhyeon
• Is Part Of: Journal of international logistics and trade. Volume 17:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 67
• Page End: 76
• Publication Date: 2019-09-30
• Subjects: Official speeches -- Text mining -- TF-IDF -- Topic analysis -- Word hierarchy analysis -- Trade; International trade -- Periodicals; Business logistics -- Periodicals; Commerce international -- Périodiques; Logistique (Organisation) -- Périodiques; Business logistics; International trade; Periodicals; 382.05
• DOI: 10.24006/jilt.2019.17.3.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1738-2122

Abstract

Abstract : Using the methodologies of text mining, this paper examines the implications of US and Chinese policies on bilateral trade. Official speeches by political leaders of the U.S. and China on the issues of trade were collected and analytically examined for US-China gaps in major foreign policies, such as bilateral trade and the Belt and Road Initiative. In this paper, a term frequency-inverse document frequency word cloud, a network similarities index, machine learning-processed latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), and structural equivalence are applied to examine the meanings of the speeches. The main arguments in this paper are as follows. First, the document similarity between the speeches of Chinese and US leaders appears to be completely different. Also, while the documents from Chinese leaders are considerably similar, the documents from US leaders differ by far. Secondly, LDA topic analysis indicates that China concentrates more on international and collaborative relationships, while the U.S. has more focus on domestic and economic interests. Third, from a word hierarchy analysis, the basic words used by American and Chinese leaders are also completely different. Agriculture, farmers, automobiles, and negotiations are the basic words for American leaders, but for Chinese leaders, the basic words are planning, markets, and education.