Prospective associations of text‐message‐based sentiment with symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety. Issue 12 (25th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stamatis, Caitlin A.; Meyerhoff, Jonah; Liu, Tingting; Sherman, Garrick; Wang, Harry; Liu, Tony; Curtis, Brenda; Ungar, Lyle H.; Mohr, David C.
• Is Part Of: Depression and anxiety. Volume 39:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 794
• Page End: 804
• Publication Date: 2022-10-25
• Subjects: anxiety -- depression -- digital phenotyping -- personal sensing -- sentiment analysis; Anxiety -- Periodicals; Depression, Mental -- Periodicals; Depression -- Periodicals; Anxiety -- Periodicals; Anxiety Disorders -- Periodicals; 616.8527005
• DOI: 10.1002/da.23286
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1091-4269

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Language patterns may elucidate mechanisms of mental health conditions. To inform underlying theory and risk models, we evaluated prospective associations between in vivo text messaging language and differential symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety. Methods: Over 16 weeks, we collected outgoing text messages from 335 adults. Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), NRC Emotion Lexicon, and previously established depression and stress dictionaries, we evaluated the degree to which language features predict symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, or social anxiety the following week using hierarchical linear models. To isolate the specificity of language effects, we also controlled for the effects of the two other symptom types. Results: We found significant relationships of language features, including personal pronouns, negative emotion, cognitive and biological processes, and informal language, with common mental health conditions, including depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety ( p s < .05). There was substantial overlap between language features and the three mental health outcomes. However, after controlling for other symptoms in the models, depressive symptoms were uniquely negatively associated with language about anticipation, trust, social processes, and affiliation ( β s: −.10 to −.09, p s < .05), whereas generalized anxiety symptoms were positively linked with these same language features ( β s: .12–.13, p s < .001). Social anxiety symptoms were uniquely associated with anger, sexual language, and swearing ( β s: .12–.13, p s < .05). Conclusion: Language that confers both common (e.g., personal pronouns and negative emotion) and specific (e.g., affiliation, anticipation, trust, and anger) risk for affective disorders is perceptible in prior week text messages, holding promise for understanding cognitive‐behavioral mechanisms and tailoring digital interventions.