Follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228). (24th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Younes, Maged; Aquilina, Gabriele; Castle, Laurence; Engel, Karl‐Heinz; Fowler, Paul J; Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose; Fürst, Peter; Gundert‐Remy, Ursula; Gürtler, Rainer; Husøy, Trine; Manco, Melania; Mennes, Wim; Moldeus, Peter; Passamonti, Sabina; Shah, Romina; Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine; Boon, Polly; Cheyns, Karlien; Crebelli, Riccardo; FitzGerald, Rex; Lambré, Claude; Mirat, Manuela; Ulbrich, Beate; Vleminckx, Christiane; Mech, Agnieszka; Rincon, Ana Maria; Tard, Alexandra; Horvath, Zsuzsanna; Wright, Matthew
• Is Part Of: EFSA journal. Volume 20:Number 11(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-11-24
• Subjects: sulfur dioxide -- E 220 -- CAS 7446‐09‐5 -- sodium sulfite -- E 221 -- CAS 7757‐83‐7 -- sodium bisulfite -- E 222 -- CAS 7631‐90‐5 -- sodium metabisulfite -- E 223 -- CAS 7681‐57‐4 -- potassium metabisulfite -- E 224 -- CAS 16731‐55‐8 -- calcium sulfite -- E 226 -- CAS 10257‐55‐3 -- calcium bisulfite -- E 227 -- CAS 13780‐03‐5 -- potassium bisulfite -- E 228 -- CAS 7773‐03‐7 -- food additive; Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Food Safety; Food -- Safety measures; Europe; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Government Publications, International; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 363.19209405
• DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1831-4732

Abstract

Abstract: Sulfur dioxide–sulfites (E 220–228) were re‐evaluated in 2016, resulting in the setting of a temporary ADI of 0.7 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day. Following a European Commission call for data, the present follow‐up opinion assesses data provided by interested business operators (IBOs) and additional evidence identified in the publicly available literature. No new biological or toxicological data addressing the data gaps described in the re‐evaluation were submitted by IBOs. Taking into account data identified from the literature search, the Panel concluded that there was no substantial reduction in the uncertainties previously identified in the re‐evaluation. Therefore, the Panel considered that the available toxicity database was inadequate to derive an ADI and withdrew the current temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI). A margin of exposure (MOE) approach was considered appropriate to assess the risk for these food additives. A lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose of 38 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, which is lower than the previous reference point of 70 mg SO2 equivalents/kg bw per day, was estimated based on prolonged visual evoked potential latency. An assessment factor of 80 was applied for the assessment of the MoE. At the estimated dietary exposures, when using a refined exposure scenario (Data set D), MOEs at the maximum of 95th percentile ranges were below 80 for all population groups except for adolescents. The dietary exposures estimated using the maximum permitted levels would result in MOEs below 80 in all population groups at the maximum of the ranges of the mean, and for most of the population groups at both minimum and maximum of the ranges at the 95th percentile. The Panel concluded that this raises a safety concern for both dietary exposure scenarios. The Panel also performed a risk assessment for toxic elements present in sulfur dioxide–sulfites (E 220–228), based on data submitted by IBOs, and concluded that the maximum limits in the EU specifications for arsenic, lead and mercury should be lowered and a maximum limit for cadmium should be introduced.