Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders. (5th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mohan, P.; Lemoine, J.; Trotter, C.; Rakova, I.; Billings, P.; Peacock, S.; Kao, C.‐Y.; Wang, Y.; Xia, F.; Eng, C. M.; Benn, P.
• Is Part Of: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 59:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 39
• Publication Date: 2022-01-05
• Subjects: autosomal dominant disorder -- cell‐free DNA -- next‐generation sequencing -- non‐invasive prenatal testing -- Noonan spectrum disorder -- single‐gene disorder; Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals; 618.047543
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.23756
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-7692

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: To assess the performance of a non‐invasive prenatal screening test (NIPT) for a panel of dominant single‐gene disorders (SGD) with a combined population incidence of 1 in 600. Methods: Cell‐free fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma samples accessioned from 14 April 2017 to 27 November 2019 was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing, targeting 30 genes, to look for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants implicated in 25 dominant conditions. The conditions included Noonan spectrum disorders, skeletal disorders, craniosynostosis syndromes, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Alagille syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, epileptic encephalopathy, SYNGAP1 ‐related intellectual disability, CHARGE syndrome, Sotos syndrome and Rett syndrome. NIPT‐SGD was made available as a clinical service to women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥ 9 weeks' gestation, with testing on maternal and paternal genomic DNA to assist in interpretation. A minimum of 4.5% fetal fraction was required for test interpretation. Variants identified in the mother were deemed inconclusive with respect to fetal carrier status. Confirmatory prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing was recommended for all screen‐positive patients and follow‐up information was requested. The screen‐positive rates with respect to the clinical indication for testing were evaluated. Results: A NIPT‐SGD result was available for 2208 women, of which 125 (5.7%) were positive. Elevated test‐positive rates were observed for referrals with a family history of a disorder on the panel (20/132 (15.2%)) or a primary indication of fetal long‐bone abnormality (60/178 (33.7%)), fetal craniofacial abnormality (6/21 (28.6%)), fetal lymphatic abnormality (20/150 (13.3%)) or major fetal cardiac defect (4/31 (12.9%)). For paternal age ≥ 40 years as a sole risk factor, the test‐positive rate was 2/912 (0.2%). Of the 125 positive cases, follow‐up information was available for 67 (53.6%), with none classified as false‐positive. No false‐negative cases were identified. Conclusions: NIPT can assist in the early detection of a set of SGD, particularly when either abnormal ultrasound findings or a family history is present. Additional clinical studies are needed to evaluate the optimal design of the gene panel, define target populations and assess patient acceptability. NIPT‐SGD offers a safe and early prenatal screening option. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.