Bridging the divide between ecological forecasts and environmental decision making. Issue 12 (12th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bodner, Korryn; Rauen Firkowski, Carina; Bennett, Joseph R.; Brookson, Cole; Dietze, Michael; Green, Stephanie; Hughes, Josie; Kerr, Jeremy; Kunegel‐Lion, Mélodie; Leroux, Shawn J.; McIntire, Eliot; Molnár, Péter K.; Simpkins, Craig; Tekwa, Edward; Watts, Alexander; Fortin, Marie‐Josée
• Is Part Of: Ecosphere. Volume 12:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-12
• Subjects: co‐production -- decision support -- forecast horizon -- iterative -- Open science -- prediction -- reproducibility -- scenario analysis -- science communication -- team‐building -- uncertainty -- validation; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3869
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2150-8925

Abstract

Abstract: The rate of human‐induced environmental change continues to accelerate, stimulating the need for rapid and science‐based decision making. The recent availability of cyberinfrastructure, open‐source data and novel techniques has increased opportunities to use ecological forecasts to predict environmental change. But to effectively inform environmental decision making, forecasts should not only be reliable, but should also be designed to address the needs of decision makers with their assumptions, uncertainties, and results clearly communicated. To help researchers better integrate forecasting into decision making, we outline ten practical guidelines to help navigate the interdisciplinary and collaborative nature of forecasting in social–ecological systems. Some guidelines focus on improving forecasting skills, including how to build better models, account for uncertainties and use technologies to improve their utility, while others are developed to facilitate the integration of forecasts with decision making, including how to form effective partnerships and how to design forecasts relevant to the specific decision being addressed. We hope these guidelines help researchers make forecasts more accurate, precise, transparent, and most pressingly, useful for informing environmental decisions.