GAPeDNA: Assessing and mapping global species gaps in genetic databases for eDNA metabarcoding. Issue 10 (17th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marques, Virginie; Milhau, Tristan; Albouy, Camille; Dejean, Tony; Manel, Stéphanie; Mouillot, David; Juhel, Jean‐Baptiste
• Editors: Dutta, Trishna
• Other Names: Yang Jun guestEditor.; Zhang Xiaowei guestEditor.; Jin Xiaowei guestEditor.; Seymour Mathew guestEditor.; Richter Catherine guestEditor.; Logares Ramiro guestEditor.; Khim Jong Seong guestEditor.; Klymus Katy guestEditor.; Zhan Aibin guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Diversity & distributions. Volume 27:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1880
• Page End: 1892
• Publication Date: 2021-03-17
• Subjects: environmental DNA -- genetic markers -- IUCN -- marine and freshwater fish -- non‐indigenous species -- reference database -- shiny -- threatened species; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13142
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1366-9516

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Environmental DNA metabarcoding has recently emerged as a non‐invasive tool for aquatic biodiversity inventories, frequently surpassing traditional methods for detecting a wide range of taxa in most habitats. The major limitation currently impairing the large‐scale application of eDNA‐based inventories is the lack of species sequences available in public genetic databases. Unfortunately, these gaps are still unknown spatially and taxonomically, hindering targeted future sequencing efforts. Innovation: We propose GAPeDNA, a user‐friendly web interface that provides a global overview of genetic database completeness for a given taxon across space and conservation status. As an application, we synthetized data from regional checklists for marine and freshwater fishes along with their IUCN conservation status to provide global maps of species coverage using the European Nucleotide Archive public reference database for 19 metabarcoding primers. This tool automatizes the scanning of gaps in these databases to guide future sequencing efforts and support the deployment of eDNA inventories at larger scale. This tool is flexible and can be expanded to other taxa and primers upon data availability. Main conclusions: Using our global fish case study, we show that gaps increase towards the tropics where species diversity and the number of threatened species are the highest. It highlights priority areas for fish sequencing like the Congo, the Mekong and the Mississippi freshwater basins which host more than 60 non‐sequenced threatened fish species. For marine fishes, the Caribbean and East Africa host up to 42 non‐sequenced threatened species. By presenting the global genetic database completeness for several primers on any taxa and building an open‐access, updatable and flexible tool, GAPeDNA appears as a valuable contribution to support any kind of eDNA metabarcoding study.