MASiVar: Multisite, multiscanner, and multisubject acquisitions for studying variability in diffusion weighted MRI. Issue 6 (16th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cai, Leon Y.; Yang, Qi; Kanakaraj, Praitayini; Nath, Vishwesh; Newton, Allen T.; Edmonson, Heidi A.; Luci, Jeffrey; Conrad, Benjamin N.; Price, Gavin R.; Hansen, Colin B.; Kerley, Cailey I.; Ramadass, Karthik; Yeh, Fang‐Cheng; Kang, Hakmook; Garyfallidis, Eleftherios; Descoteaux, Maxime; Rheault, Francois; Schilling, Kurt G.; Landman, Bennett A.
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 86:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 3304
• Page End: 3320
• Publication Date: 2021-07-16
• Subjects: bundle segmentation -- connectome -- DTI -- NODDI -- reproducibility -- variability; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28926
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Diffusion‐weighted imaging allows investigators to identify structural, microstructural, and connectivity‐based differences between subjects, but variability due to session and scanner biases is a challenge. Methods: To investigate DWI variability, we present MASiVar, a multisite data set consisting of 319 diffusion scans acquired at 3 T from b = 1000 to 3000 s/mm 2 across 14 healthy adults, 83 healthy children (5 to 8 years), three sites, and four scanners as a publicly available, preprocessed, and de‐identified data set. With the adult data, we demonstrate the capacity of MASiVar to simultaneously quantify the intrasession, intersession, interscanner, and intersubject variability of four common DWI processing approaches: (1) a tensor signal representation, (2) a multi‐compartment neurite orientation dispersion and density model, (3) white‐matter bundle segmentation, and (4) structural connectomics. Respectively, we evaluate region‐wise fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector; region‐wise CSF volume fraction, intracellular volume fraction, and orientation dispersion index; bundle‐wise shape, volume, fractional anisotropy, and length; and whole connectome correlation and maximized modularity, global efficiency, and characteristic path length. Results: We plot the variability in these measures at each level and find that it consistently increases with intrasession to intersession to interscanner to intersubject effects across all processing approaches and that sometimes interscanner variability can approach intersubject variability. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of MASiVar to more globally investigate DWI variability across multiple levels and processing approaches simultaneously and suggests harmonization between scanners for multisite analyses should be considered before inference of group differences on subjects.