Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies. (23rd December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies. (23rd December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies
- Authors:
- Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F
Adriaanse, Paulien
Aldrich, Annette
Berny, Philippe
Coja, Tamara
Duquesne, Sabine
Focks, Andreas
Marinovich, Marina
Millet, Maurice
Pelkonen, Olavi
Pieper, Silvia
Tiktak, Aaldrik
Topping, Christopher J
Widenfalk, Anneli
Wilks, Martin
Wolterink, Gerrit
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Louisse, Jochem
Rudaz, Serge
Testai, Emanuela
Lostia, Alfonso
Dorne, Jean‐Lou
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel - Abstract:
- Abstract: EFSA asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues to deliver a Scientific Opinion on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies for both new active substances and existing ones. The main aim of comparative in vitro metabolism studies of pesticide active substances is to evaluate whether all significant metabolites formed in the human in vitro test system, as a surrogate of the in vivo situation, are also present at comparable level in animal species tested in toxicological studies and, therefore, if their potential toxicity has been appropriately covered by animal studies. The studies may also help to decide which animal model, with regard to a particular compound, is the most relevant for humans. In the experimental strategy, primary hepatocytes in suspension or culture are recommended since hepatocytes are considered the most representative in vitro system for prediction of in vivo metabolites. The experimental design of 3 × 3 × 3 (concentrations, time points, technical replicates, on pooled hepatocytes) will maximise the chance to identify unique (UHM) and disproportionate (DHM) human metabolites. When DHM and UHM are being assessed, test item‐related radioactivity recovery and metabolite profile are the most important parameters. Subsequently, structural characterisation of the assigned metabolites is performed with appropriate analytical techniques. In toxicological assessment of metabolites, the uncertainty factorAbstract: EFSA asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues to deliver a Scientific Opinion on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies for both new active substances and existing ones. The main aim of comparative in vitro metabolism studies of pesticide active substances is to evaluate whether all significant metabolites formed in the human in vitro test system, as a surrogate of the in vivo situation, are also present at comparable level in animal species tested in toxicological studies and, therefore, if their potential toxicity has been appropriately covered by animal studies. The studies may also help to decide which animal model, with regard to a particular compound, is the most relevant for humans. In the experimental strategy, primary hepatocytes in suspension or culture are recommended since hepatocytes are considered the most representative in vitro system for prediction of in vivo metabolites. The experimental design of 3 × 3 × 3 (concentrations, time points, technical replicates, on pooled hepatocytes) will maximise the chance to identify unique (UHM) and disproportionate (DHM) human metabolites. When DHM and UHM are being assessed, test item‐related radioactivity recovery and metabolite profile are the most important parameters. Subsequently, structural characterisation of the assigned metabolites is performed with appropriate analytical techniques. In toxicological assessment of metabolites, the uncertainty factor approach is the first alternative to testing option, followed by new approach methodologies (QSAR, read‐across, in vitro methods), and only if these fail, in vivo animal toxicity studies may be performed. Knowledge of in vitro metabolites in human and animal hepatocytes would enable toxicological evaluation of all metabolites of concern, and, furthermore, add useful pieces of information for detection and evaluation of metabolites in different matrices (crops, livestock, environment), improve biomonitoring efforts via better toxicokinetic understanding, and ultimately, develop regulatory schemes employing physiologically based or physiology‐mimicking in silico and/or in vitro test systems to anticipate the exposure of humans to potentially hazardous substances in plant protection products. Abstract : This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2021.EN-6989/full … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- EFSA journal. Volume 19:Number 12(2021)
- Journal:
- EFSA journal
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Number 12(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 12 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0019-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12-23
- Subjects:
- xenobiotic -- reactive metabolites -- interspecies metabolism -- suspension/plated hepatocytes -- clearance -- PBK -- QSAR -- in silico
Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals
Food Safety
Food -- Safety measures
Europe
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Government Publications, International
Internet Resources
Periodicals
Periodicals
363.19209405 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732 ↗
- DOI:
- 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6970 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1831-4732
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 24506.xml