Analysis of suitable private-secondary-main sewer diameters in rural areas based on cost model and hydraulic calculation. (1st March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Wenkai; Zheng, Tianlong; Ma, Yingqun; Liu, Junxin
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 281(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03-01
• Subjects: Cost -- Household number -- Length/width ratio -- Rural sewer -- Small diameter; CCR Cost cut rate -- EPA Environmental Protection Agency -- HDPE High-density polyethylene -- O&M Operation and maintenance -- SWMM Storm Water Management Model -- UPVC Unplasticized polyvinyl chloride -- WWTPs Wastewater treatment plants; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111925
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: High cost of sewer systems usually restricts the sewage collection in rural areas. Many rural areas take traditional sewer scheme whose private-secondary-main sewer diameter is 110–200-300 mm without hydraulic calculation and increased the total cost of sewers. The rational utilization of small diameter sewers might contribute to sewer cost reduction. In this study, rural sewer length and cost models were established taking sewer diameter, household number, and length/width ratio of village as parameters to evaluate the cost benefits of using small diameter sewers. Hydraulic calculation of sewers was applied by Storm Water Management Model to ensure the small diameter sewers were feasible. The results indicate that household number and length/width ratio cause obvious impact on sewer length and cost. Main sewer with 200 mm diameter is suitable for the village with less than 1000 households. Using small diameter sewers can reduce the sewer cost by 6–15% compared with traditional sewer scheme and 110-110-200 might be the better scheme to rural areas because of the low cost (including construction cost and operation and maintenance cost) and high tolerance of sewage flow fluctuation. This study provided the suitable diameter of rural sewers based on cost model and hydraulic calculation which might be helpful for the application of rural sewers. Highlights: 200 mm diameter main sewer suits for the village with less than 1000 households. Small diameter sewers can reduce 6–15% cost compared with traditional scheme. 110-110-200 mm is the better scheme with low cost and good hydraulic conditions. High length/width ratio of village increases the cost of sewers per household.