Virological and Serological Assessment of US Army Trainees Isolated for Coronavirus Disease 2019. (11th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hakre, Shilpa; Lakhal-Naouar, Ines; King, David B; Burns, Jennifer L; Jackson, Kenya N; Krauss, Stephen W; Chandrasekaran, Prabha; McCauley, Melanie D; Ober Shepherd, Brittany L; McHenry, Samantha; Bianchi, Elizabeth J; Ouellette, Jason; Darden, Janice M; Sanborn, Aaron D; Daye, Sharon P; Kwon, Paul O; Stubbs, Jeremiah; Brigantti, Crystal L; Hall, Tara L; Beagle, Milford H; Pieri, Jason A; Frambes, Timothy R; O'Connell, Robert J; Modjarrad, Kayvon; Murray, Clinton K; Jagodzinski, Linda L; Scott, Paul T; Peel, Sheila A
• Is Part Of: Journal of infectious diseases. Volume 226:Number 10(2022)
• Page Start: 1743
• Page End: 1752
• Publication Date: 2022-05-11
• Subjects: SARS-CoV-2 -- cycle threshold value -- isolation -- Army recruit -- sgRNA; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Diseases -- Causes and theories of causation -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac198
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1899

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Laboratory screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a key mitigation measure to avoid the spread of infection among recruits starting basic combat training in a congregate setting. Because viral nucleic acid can be detected persistently after recovery, we evaluated other laboratory markers to distinguish recruits who could proceed with training from those who were infected. Methods: Recruits isolated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were serially tested for SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic ribonucleic acid (sgRNA), and viral load (VL) by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and for anti- SARS-CoV-2. Cluster and quadratic discriminant analyses of results were performed. Results: Among 229 recruits isolated for COVID-19, those with a RT-PCR cycle threshold >30.49 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 96%) or having sgRNA log10 RNA copies/mL <3.09 (sensitivity and specificity 96%) at entry into isolation were likely SARS-CoV-2 uninfected. Viral load >4.58 log10 RNA copies/mL or anti-SARS-CoV-2 signal-to-cutoff ratio <1.38 (VL: sensitivity and specificity 93%; anti-SARS-CoV-2: sensitivity 83%, specificity 79%) had comparatively lower sensitivity and specificity when used alone for discrimination of infected from uninfected. Conclusions: Orthogonal laboratory assays used in combination with RT-PCR may have utility in determining SARS-CoV-2 infection status for decisions regarding isolation. Abstract : Longitudinal viral/serological testing of US military recruits diagnosed with COVID-19 indicate a cycle threshold <30.49 or subgenomic-RNA >3.09 log10 copies/mL showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for identification of active infection. Adding a supplemental screening test may inform quarantine/isolation decisions.