Carbon Offsetting and Justice: A Kantian Response. Issue 3 (2nd September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vereb, Zachary
• Is Part Of: Ethics, policy & environment. Volume 25:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 253
• Page End: 257
• Publication Date: 2022-09-02
• Subjects: Offsetting -- climate change -- Kant -- justice; Environmental ethics -- Periodicals; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; 179.1
• DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2022.2104094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2155-0085

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In 'Should I offset or should I do more good?', H. Orri Stefansson defends an argument that calls into question the belief that we can discharge our duties to prevent harm by carbon offsetting. Stefansson suggests that other actions, such as donations, should be preferred. This paper questions aspects of that analysis by evaluating the normative assumptions underlying it. It does so from a broadly Kantian perspective. I begin by highlighting assumptions that could benefit from elaboration and defense. These concern justice, anthropocentrism, imputability, and temporal perspectives. Lastly, I consider Kant's long-term view of humanity to supplement any short-termist limitations.