Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment*This article is an updated version of: Refinetti M, D'Ascoli S, Ohana R and Goldt S 2021 Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Machine Learning vol 139 ed M Meila and T Zhang pp 8925–35. (1st November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment*This article is an updated version of: Refinetti M, D'Ascoli S, Ohana R and Goldt S 2021 Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Machine Learning vol 139 ed M Meila and T Zhang pp 8925–35. (1st November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment*This article is an updated version of: Refinetti M, D'Ascoli S, Ohana R and Goldt S 2021 Align, then memorise: the dynamics of learning with feedback alignment Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Machine Learning vol 139 ed M Meila and T Zhang pp 8925–35.
- Authors:
- Refinetti, Maria
d'Ascoli, Stéphane
Ohana, Ruben
Goldt, Sebastian - Abstract:
- Abstract: Direct feedback alignment (DFA) is emerging as an efficient and biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation for training deep neural networks. Despite relying on random feedback weights for the backward pass, DFA successfully trains state-of-the-art models such as transformers. On the other hand, it notoriously fails to train convolutional networks. An understanding of the inner workings of DFA to explain these diverging results remains elusive. Here, we propose a theory of feedback alignment algorithms. We first show that learning in shallow networks proceeds in two steps: an alignment phase, where the model adapts its weights to align the approximate gradient with the true gradient of the loss function, is followed by a memorisation phase, where the model focuses on fitting the data. This two-step process has a degeneracy breaking effect: out of all the low-loss solutions in the landscape, a network trained with DFA naturally converges to the solution which maximises gradient alignment. We also identify a key quantity underlying alignment in deep linear networks: the conditioning of the alignment matrices . The latter enables a detailed understanding of the impact of data structure on alignment, and suggests a simple explanation for the well-known failure of DFA to train convolutional neural networks. Numerical experiments on MNIST and CIFAR10 clearly demonstrate degeneracy breaking in deep non-linear networks and show that the align-then-memorizeAbstract: Direct feedback alignment (DFA) is emerging as an efficient and biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation for training deep neural networks. Despite relying on random feedback weights for the backward pass, DFA successfully trains state-of-the-art models such as transformers. On the other hand, it notoriously fails to train convolutional networks. An understanding of the inner workings of DFA to explain these diverging results remains elusive. Here, we propose a theory of feedback alignment algorithms. We first show that learning in shallow networks proceeds in two steps: an alignment phase, where the model adapts its weights to align the approximate gradient with the true gradient of the loss function, is followed by a memorisation phase, where the model focuses on fitting the data. This two-step process has a degeneracy breaking effect: out of all the low-loss solutions in the landscape, a network trained with DFA naturally converges to the solution which maximises gradient alignment. We also identify a key quantity underlying alignment in deep linear networks: the conditioning of the alignment matrices . The latter enables a detailed understanding of the impact of data structure on alignment, and suggests a simple explanation for the well-known failure of DFA to train convolutional neural networks. Numerical experiments on MNIST and CIFAR10 clearly demonstrate degeneracy breaking in deep non-linear networks and show that the align-then-memorize process occurs sequentially from the bottom layers of the network to the top. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of statistical mechanics. (2022:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Journal of statistical mechanics
- Issue:
- (2022:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 1000095 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 1000095
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-1000095-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-01
- Subjects:
- deep learning -- machine learning
Statistical mechanics -- Periodicals
Mechanics -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals
530.1305 - Journal URLs:
- http://ioppublishing.org/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1088/1742-5468/ac9826 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1742-5468
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24479.xml