A Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1‐3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601). (30th September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1‐3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601). (30th September 2019)
- Main Title:
- A Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1‐3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601)
- Authors:
- Terazawa, Tetsuji
Matsuyama, Jin
Goto, Masahiro
Kawabata, Ryohei
Endo, Shunji
Imano, Motohiro
Fujita, Shoichiro
Akamaru, Yusuke
Taniguchi, Hirokazu
Tatsumi, Mitsutoshi
Lee, Sang‐Woong
Kurisu, Yoshitaka
Kawakami, Hisato
Kurokawa, Yukinori
Shimokawa, Toshio
Sakai, Daisuke
Kato, Takeshi
Fujitani, Kazumasa
Satoh, Taroh - Abstract:
- Abstract: Lessons Learned: Perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) therapy showed favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response. Small sample size limited the statistical power of this result. Perioperative CapeOx therapy showed good feasibility. Further studies with larger sample size are required to validate this novel approach. Background: D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S‐1 is the standard therapy for patients (pts) with stage III gastric cancer (GC) in Japan; however, the outcome is not satisfactory. We examined the efficacy of perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in pts with GC. Methods: The eligibility criteria included confirmed clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1‐3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification (JCGC; 3rd English Edition). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (NAC; capecitabine, 2, 000 mg/m 2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m 2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by five cycles of adjuvant CapeOx (AC) after D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) according to the JCGC (≥grade 1b). Results: Thirty‐seven pts were enrolled on CapeOx. An R0 resection rate of 78.4% ( n = 29) and a pRR of 54.1% ( n = 20, p = .058; 90% confidence interval [CI], 39.4–68.2) were demonstrated. Among 27 pts who initiated AC, 21 (63.6%) completed the treatment. Grade 3–4 toxicities during NAC included neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anorexia (8%) and during AC includedAbstract: Lessons Learned: Perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) therapy showed favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response. Small sample size limited the statistical power of this result. Perioperative CapeOx therapy showed good feasibility. Further studies with larger sample size are required to validate this novel approach. Background: D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S‐1 is the standard therapy for patients (pts) with stage III gastric cancer (GC) in Japan; however, the outcome is not satisfactory. We examined the efficacy of perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in pts with GC. Methods: The eligibility criteria included confirmed clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1‐3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification (JCGC; 3rd English Edition). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (NAC; capecitabine, 2, 000 mg/m 2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m 2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by five cycles of adjuvant CapeOx (AC) after D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) according to the JCGC (≥grade 1b). Results: Thirty‐seven pts were enrolled on CapeOx. An R0 resection rate of 78.4% ( n = 29) and a pRR of 54.1% ( n = 20, p = .058; 90% confidence interval [CI], 39.4–68.2) were demonstrated. Among 27 pts who initiated AC, 21 (63.6%) completed the treatment. Grade 3–4 toxicities during NAC included neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anorexia (8%) and during AC included neutropenia (37%), diarrhea (4%), and anorexia (4%). Conclusion: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response, although statistical significance at .058 did not reach the commonly accepted cutoff of .05. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigations. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Oncologist. Volume 25:Number 2(2020)
- Journal:
- Oncologist
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Number 2(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0025-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 119
- Page End:
- e208
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09-30
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Oncology
Tumors
Neoplasms
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/oncolo ↗
https://theoncologist.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1549490x ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0601 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1083-7159
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6256.890000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24490.xml