United States' experience in nuchal translucency measurement: variation according to provider characteristics in over five million ultrasound examinations. (1st November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thornburg, L. L.; Bromley, B.; Dugoff, L.; Platt, L. D.; Fuchs, K. M.; Norton, M. E.; McIntosh, J.; Toland, G. J.; Cuckle, H.
• Is Part Of: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 58:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 732
• Page End: 737
• Publication Date: 2021-11-01
• Subjects: aneuploidy screening -- epidemiological monitoring -- NTQR -- nuchal translucency -- ultrasound; Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals; 618.047543
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.23621
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-7692

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: The Nuchal Translucency Quality Review (NTQR) program has provided standardized education, credentialing and epidemiological monitoring of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements since 2005. Our aim was to review the effect on NT measurement of provider characteristics since the program's inception. Methods: We evaluated the distribution of NT measurements performed between January 2005 and December 2019, for each of the three primary performance indicators of NT measurement (NT median multiples of the median (MoM), SD of log10 NT MoM and slope of NT with respect to crown–rump length (CRL)) for all providers within the NTQR program with more than 30 paired NT/CRL results. Provider characteristics explored as potential sources of variability included: number of NT ultrasound examinations performed annually (annual scan volume of the provider), duration of participation in the NTQR program, initial credentialing by an alternative pathway, provider type (physician vs sonographer) and number of NT‐credentialed providers within the practice (size of practice). Each of these provider characteristics was evaluated for its effect on NT median MoM and geometric mean of the NT median MoM weighted for the number of ultrasound scans, and multiple regression was performed across all variables to control for potential confounders. Results: Of 5 216 663 NT measurements from 9340 providers at 3319 sites, the majority (75%) of providers had an NT median MoM within the acceptable range of 0.9–1.1 and 85.5% had NT median MoM not statistically significantly outside this range. Provider characteristics associated with measurement within the expected range of performance included higher volume of NT scans performed annually, practice at a site with larger numbers of other NT‐credentialed providers, longer duration of participation in the NTQR program and alternative initial credentialing pathway. Conclusions: Annual scan volume, duration of participation in the NTQR program, alternative initial credentialing pathway and number of other NT‐credentialed providers within the practice are all associated with outcome metrics indicating quality of performance. It is critical that providers participate in ongoing quality assessment of NT measurement to maintain consistency and precision. Ongoing assessment programs with continuous feedback and education are necessary to maintain quality care. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.