Cytotoxicity and anti-biofilm properties of novel hybrid-glass-based caries infiltrant. Issue 12 (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nedeljkovic, Ivana; Doulabi, Behrouz Zandieh; Abdelaziz, Marwa; Feilzer, Albert J.; Exterkate, Rob A.M.; Szafert, Slawomir; Gulia, Nurbey; Krejci, Ivo; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.
• Is Part Of: Dental materials. Volume 38:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 2052
• Page End: 2061
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: Cytotoxicity -- Biocompatibility -- Biofilm growth -- Resin infiltration -- Icon -- Hybrid glass -- Proximal caries -- White spot lesions; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dental materials -- Periodicals; 617.695
• DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0109-5641

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To assess the cytotoxicity of an experimental hybrid-glass-based infiltrant and its effect on biofilm attachment, growth and metabolic activity, and to compare it to the resin-based infiltrant Icon. Methods: Cytotoxicity of hybrid-glass-based material (EXP ) and resin-based infiltrant Icon (Icon ) was tested in direct contact tests on freshly cured (direct_mat ) and on materials kept for 24 h in cell culture medium (direct_exmat ), and extract test with materials 24-h extracts (extract ). Cell viability of L929 mouse fibroblast cell line was measured with MTT assay, according to ISO10993–5:2009. Biofilm attachment (5 h), growth (24 h and 48 h) and lactic-acid production (24 h and 48 h) on glass-disk specimens coated with EXP or Icon, or uncoated (control ), were assessed using a microcosm biofilm model and Amsterdam Active Attachment system. At indicated time points, biofilms were harvested, plated, and CFU counts were determined, while lactic-acid production was measured colorimetrically. Results: Cell viability reduction by EXP was below 30%-threshold in direct contact tests, while in extract test an increased cell viability was observed. Icon reduced cell viability substantially in all three tests. Significantly less bacteria attached to the surface of EXP after 5 h compared to Icon and control. Biofilm growth was significantly lower on EXP than on Icon and control after 24 h, but this difference was smaller and statistically insignificant after 48 h. There was no difference in lactic-acid production among groups. Significance: Novel hybrid-glass-based infiltrant seems to have a better biocompatibility and accumulates on its surface less bacteria than resin-based infiltrant, which makes it an attractive resin-free alternative. Highlights: Hybrid-glass-based infiltrant shows no cytotoxic effect on L929 fibroblasts. Initial bacterial attachment and early biofilm growth are significantly lower on hybrid-glass-based infiltrant compared to resin-based infiltrant. Hybrid-glass-based infiltrant is an attractive alternative to resin-based infiltrant.