Raster-based landslide susceptibility mapping using compensatory MADM methods. (January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Salehpour Jam, Amin; Mosaffaie, Jamal; Tabatabaei, Mahmoud Reza
• Is Part Of: Environmental modelling & software. Volume 159(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-01
• Subjects: Compensatory MADM methods -- Consistency ratio -- Decision matrix -- Group decision-making -- Pixel-based geo-processing; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Computer Simulation -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Écologie -- Simulation, Méthodes de -- Périodiques; Simulation par ordinateur -- Périodiques; Logiciels -- Périodiques; Computer software; Digital computer simulation; Ecology -- Computer simulation; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70015118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105567
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-8152

Abstract

Abstract: Landslide Susceptibility Maps (LSMs) are among the essential layers for landslide risk management in landslide-prone regions. This study proposes raster-based landslide susceptibility mapping using widely used compensatory Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) methods, including AHP-SAW, AHP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR in the Razmian region, Iran. The results showed that the range of Area Under the Curve (AUC) values varied from 0.793 to 0.833. Therefore, all LSMs derived from the compensatory MADM methods are within the acceptable and excellent acceptance range, so the accuracy of MADM methods is acceptable for TOPSIS and VIKOR (V = 0.0) and excellent for other methods. Validation results also showed that VIKOR0.7 is the best method to produce the LSM based on the Quality Sum (Qs) index and AUC values. In general, pixel-based landslide susceptibility mapping using compensatory MADM methods in combination with the group decision-making approach in AHP is recommended for landslide risk management and land-use planning. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: SAW, TOPSIS, and VIKOR methods were compared for landslide susceptibility mapping. Most compensatory MADM methods had an excellent performance to produce hazard maps. VIKOR0.7 was introduced as the best method to produce landslide susceptibility maps. Suggested default value of the V coefficient for the VIKOR is not the best value. The best weight for the strategy of the majority of criteria should be examined.