Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge in California. Issue 3 (5th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ulibarri, Nicola; Escobedo Garcia, Nataly; Nelson, Rebecca L.; Cravens, Amanda E.; McCarty, Ryan J.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 57:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-03-05
• Subjects: California -- feasibility -- groundwater -- managed aquifer recharge -- Sustainable Groundwater Management Act; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1029/2020WR029292
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: With aquifers around the world stressed by over‐extraction, water managers are increasingly turning to managed aquifer recharge (MAR), directly replenishing groundwater resources through injection wells, recharge basins, or other approaches. While there has been progress in understanding the geological and infrastructure‐related considerations to make MAR more effective, critical evaluations of its institutional design and implementation are limited. This study assesses MAR projects, using a case study of projects proposed by groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) in California to comply with the state's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014; these projects will almost double the number of MAR projects in the United States. We draw on content analysis of groundwater sustainability plans that propose these projects. We first assess the types of recharge projects proposed and the stated aims of the projects, to assess when and why agencies are turning to MAR as a solution. We find that recharge basins are by far the most common approach, and that GSAs hope these basins will improve water table levels, reduce subsidence, and improve water quality. We then analyze potential barriers to project implementation and assess the projects' ability to achieve the stated goals. Primary concerns identified include a potential lack of available water, a potentially challenging legal framework, and minimal consideration of funding and cumulative land needs. To conclude, we discuss broader considerations for ensuring that MAR is an effective water management tool. Key Points: 233 Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) projects are proposed in California, almost doubling the number of MAR projects in the United States We identify multiple feasibility concerns, including inconsistent legal requirements and water, funding, and land availability MAR's ability to help reverse decades of over‐extraction in California can only be realized if implemented effectively