Male-female differences in acute type B aortic dissection: the DisSEXion study. (3rd October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Male-female differences in acute type B aortic dissection: the DisSEXion study. (3rd October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Male-female differences in acute type B aortic dissection: the DisSEXion study
- Authors:
- Meccanici, F
Thijssen, C G E
Gokalp, A L
De Bruin, J L
Bekkers, J A
Van Kimmenade, R R J
Geuzebroek, G S C
Poyck, P
Ter Woorst, F J
Post, M C
Heijmen, R H
Mokhles, M M
Takkenberg, J J M
Roos-Hesselink, J W
Verhagen, H J M - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background/Introduction: Acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is a cardiovascular emergency with high risk of morbidity and mortality. Elucidating male-female differences in ATBAD might help optimize patient-specific care, while data is scarce on this topic. Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify differences between male and female ATBAD patients in presentation, management and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients who presented with ATBAD between 2007–2017 in four tertiary centers. Non-acute, traumatic, and iatrogenic dissections were excluded. We included patients presenting with an intramural hematoma or penetrating aortic ulcer in acute setting. Results: The study population consisted of 384 patients, of which 41% (n=156) was female. In comparison to males, females presented at an older age (67 [IQR: 57–73] vs. 62 [IQR: 52–71], p=0.015) and fewer female patients had a history of abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% vs. 15%, p=0.009). Imaging diagnostics revealed a smaller proportion of patients with distally extended dissections in females. DeBakey type IIIb was diagnosed less frequently in females (73% vs. 85%, p=0.008) as was renal artery involvement (48% vs. 66%, p=0.009). Furthermore, classical type B dissection was less often observed in female patients compared to male patients (56% vs. 78%, p<0.001). Absolute maximum thoracic aortic diameters were not significantly different in females andAbstract: Background/Introduction: Acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is a cardiovascular emergency with high risk of morbidity and mortality. Elucidating male-female differences in ATBAD might help optimize patient-specific care, while data is scarce on this topic. Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify differences between male and female ATBAD patients in presentation, management and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients who presented with ATBAD between 2007–2017 in four tertiary centers. Non-acute, traumatic, and iatrogenic dissections were excluded. We included patients presenting with an intramural hematoma or penetrating aortic ulcer in acute setting. Results: The study population consisted of 384 patients, of which 41% (n=156) was female. In comparison to males, females presented at an older age (67 [IQR: 57–73] vs. 62 [IQR: 52–71], p=0.015) and fewer female patients had a history of abdominal aortic aneurysm (6% vs. 15%, p=0.009). Imaging diagnostics revealed a smaller proportion of patients with distally extended dissections in females. DeBakey type IIIb was diagnosed less frequently in females (73% vs. 85%, p=0.008) as was renal artery involvement (48% vs. 66%, p=0.009). Furthermore, classical type B dissection was less often observed in female patients compared to male patients (56% vs. 78%, p<0.001). Absolute maximum thoracic aortic diameters were not significantly different in females and males (44.0 [38.0–50.0] mm vs. 42.0 [39.0–49.0], p=0.870). No male-female differences were found in treatment strategy (p=0.561, Figure 1). In-hospital/30-day mortality was 9.6% in female patients and 11.8% in male patients (p=0.603). Long-term mortality did not show a significant male-female difference (p=0.90) during a median follow-up duration of 6.1 [IQR: 4.1–9.1] years (Figure 2). Conclusion: This study showed that female patients were older at presentation, while male patients more often had distally extended dissections. Although mortality was not significantly different, we encourage male-female specific risk factor studies on late mortality. In this way ATBAD male and female patients at high risk of mortality can be identified and patient-specific care can be implemented. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): ZonMw … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European heart journal. Volume 43(2022)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- European heart journal
- Issue:
- Volume 43(2022)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0043-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-03
- Subjects:
- Cardiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.12005 - Journal URLs:
- http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1948 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0195-668X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.717500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24438.xml