Cardiolipin, and not monolysocardiolipin, preferentially binds to the interface of complexes III and IV. Issue 45 (9th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Corey, Robin A.; Harrison, Noah; Stansfeld, Philllp J.; Sansom, Mark S. P.; Duncan, Anna L.
• Is Part Of: Chemical science. Volume 13:Issue 45(2022)
• Page Start: 13489
• Page End: 13498
• Publication Date: 2022-11-09
• Subjects: Chemistry -- Periodicals; 540.5
• DOI: 10.1039/d2sc04072g
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-6520

Abstract

Abstract : Cardiolipin interacts more strongly than a disease-related lipid, monolysocardiolipin, at the interface of Complex III and Complex IV in mitochondrial respiratory supercomplexes. Abstract : The mitochondrial electron transport chain comprises a series of protein complexes embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane that generate a proton motive force via oxidative phosphorylation, ultimately generating ATP. These protein complexes can oligomerize to form larger structures called supercomplexes. Cardiolipin (CL), a conical lipid, unique within eukaryotes to the inner mitochondrial membrane, has proven essential in maintaining the stability and function of supercomplexes. Monolysocardiolipin (MLCL) is a CL variant that accumulates in people with Barth syndrome (BTHS). BTHS is caused by defects in CL biosynthesis and characterised by abnormal mitochondrial bioenergetics and destabilised supercomplexes. However, the mechanisms by which MLCL causes pathogenesis remain unclear. Here, multiscale molecular dynamics characterise the interactions of CL and MLCL with yeast and mammalian mitochondrial supercomplexes containing complex III (CIII) and complex IV (CIV). Coarse-grained simulations reveal that both CL and MLCL bind to sites at the interface between CIII and CIV of the supercomplex. Free energy perturbation calculations show that MLCL interaction is weaker than that of CL and suggest that interaction with CIV drives this difference. Atomistic contact analyses show that, although interaction with CIII is similar for CL and MLCL, CIV makes more contacts with CL than MLCL, demonstrating that CL is a more successful "glue" between the two complexes. Simulations of the human CIII2 CIV supercomplex show that this interface site is maintained between species. Our study suggests that MLCL accumulation in people with BTHS disrupts supercomplex stability by formation of relatively weak interactions at the interface lipid binding site.