Assessment of imaging models for volumetric tomography of fluid flows. (30th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment of imaging models for volumetric tomography of fluid flows. (30th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Assessment of imaging models for volumetric tomography of fluid flows
- Authors:
- Peng, Fan
Liu, Hecong
Zhao, Qin
Worth, Nicholas
Cai, Weiwei - Abstract:
- Highlights: An assessment of nine imaging models is conducted in terms of accuracy, computational cost, and range of applicability. A "sample matrix" extracted from the weighting matrix is used in predicting and optimizing the accuracy of an imaging model. The Voxel Spread Function (VSF) model is the most accurate, but the computational cost is the highest. The Ray length and Voxel-centric Direct models suffer larger errors when applied to objects with higher spatial frequency. Abstract: Volumetric tomography is a powerful tool that employs 2D projections to reconstruct unknown physical quantities in 3D fluid flows. A mathematical model of the imaging process is required to recover the desired volumetric fields. Errors in the imaging model can corrupt the reconstructions, so an accurate model is critical. This work reports the first systematic assessment of nine imaging models in terms of accuracy, computational cost, and range of applicability. A sample matrix method is developed to assess and improve the model's accuracy. A flame chemiluminescence tomography experiment and a synthetic tomographic particle image velocimetry test were conducted. For both luminosity field reconstruction and velocity estimation, the Voxel Spread Function (VSF) model is the most accurate, but the computational cost is tens or hundreds of times higher than other models. The worst models are the Ray-length and VC Direct models. Their error increases when the spatial frequency or seeding densityHighlights: An assessment of nine imaging models is conducted in terms of accuracy, computational cost, and range of applicability. A "sample matrix" extracted from the weighting matrix is used in predicting and optimizing the accuracy of an imaging model. The Voxel Spread Function (VSF) model is the most accurate, but the computational cost is the highest. The Ray length and Voxel-centric Direct models suffer larger errors when applied to objects with higher spatial frequency. Abstract: Volumetric tomography is a powerful tool that employs 2D projections to reconstruct unknown physical quantities in 3D fluid flows. A mathematical model of the imaging process is required to recover the desired volumetric fields. Errors in the imaging model can corrupt the reconstructions, so an accurate model is critical. This work reports the first systematic assessment of nine imaging models in terms of accuracy, computational cost, and range of applicability. A sample matrix method is developed to assess and improve the model's accuracy. A flame chemiluminescence tomography experiment and a synthetic tomographic particle image velocimetry test were conducted. For both luminosity field reconstruction and velocity estimation, the Voxel Spread Function (VSF) model is the most accurate, but the computational cost is tens or hundreds of times higher than other models. The worst models are the Ray-length and VC Direct models. Their error increases when the spatial frequency or seeding density of the object field increases. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Measurement. Volume 204(2023)
- Journal:
- Measurement
- Issue:
- Volume 204(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 204, Issue 2023 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 204
- Issue:
- 2023
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0204-2023-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-30
- Subjects:
- Volumetric tomography -- Imaging model -- Flow field diagnostics
Weights and measures -- Periodicals
Measurement -- Periodicals
Measurement
Weights and measures
Periodicals
530.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02632241 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112174 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0263-2241
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5413.544700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24419.xml