Comparing single‐target and multitarget approaches for postoperative circulating tumour DNA detection in stage II–III colorectal cancer patients. Issue 20 (18th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing single‐target and multitarget approaches for postoperative circulating tumour DNA detection in stage II–III colorectal cancer patients. Issue 20 (18th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- Comparing single‐target and multitarget approaches for postoperative circulating tumour DNA detection in stage II–III colorectal cancer patients
- Authors:
- Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Reinert, Thomas
Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov
Demuth, Christina
Løve, Uffe Schou
Madsen, Anders Husted
Gotschalck, Kåre Andersson
Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg - Abstract:
- Abstract : Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) detection for postoperative risk stratification in cancer patients has great clinical potential. However, low ctDNA abundances complicates detection. Multitarget (MT) detection strategies have been developed to increase sensitivity. Yet, empirical evidence supporting performance gains of MT vs. single‐target (ST) strategies in a postoperative setting is limited. We compared ctDNA detection in 379 paired plasma samples from 112 stage II–III colorectal cancer patients by ST digital PCR and MT sequencing of 16 patient‐specific variants. The strategies exhibited good concordance (90%, Cohen's Kappa 0.79), with highly correlated ctDNA quantifications (Pearson r = 0.985). A difference was observed in ctDNA detection preoperatively (ST 72/92, MT 88/92). However, no difference was observed immediately after surgery in recurrence (ST 11/22, MT 10/22) or nonrecurrence (both 2/34) patients. In serial samples, detection was similar within recurrence (ST 13/16, MT 14/16) and nonrecurrence (ST 3/49, MT 1/49) patients. Both approaches yielded similar lead times to standard‐of‐care radiology (ST 4.0 months, MT 4.1 months). Our findings do not support significant performance gains of the MT strategy over the ST strategy for postoperative ctDNA detection. Abstract : Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is potentially useful for postoperative risk stratification, but its detection is challenging. To examine whether tracking multiple targets improvesAbstract : Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) detection for postoperative risk stratification in cancer patients has great clinical potential. However, low ctDNA abundances complicates detection. Multitarget (MT) detection strategies have been developed to increase sensitivity. Yet, empirical evidence supporting performance gains of MT vs. single‐target (ST) strategies in a postoperative setting is limited. We compared ctDNA detection in 379 paired plasma samples from 112 stage II–III colorectal cancer patients by ST digital PCR and MT sequencing of 16 patient‐specific variants. The strategies exhibited good concordance (90%, Cohen's Kappa 0.79), with highly correlated ctDNA quantifications (Pearson r = 0.985). A difference was observed in ctDNA detection preoperatively (ST 72/92, MT 88/92). However, no difference was observed immediately after surgery in recurrence (ST 11/22, MT 10/22) or nonrecurrence (both 2/34) patients. In serial samples, detection was similar within recurrence (ST 13/16, MT 14/16) and nonrecurrence (ST 3/49, MT 1/49) patients. Both approaches yielded similar lead times to standard‐of‐care radiology (ST 4.0 months, MT 4.1 months). Our findings do not support significant performance gains of the MT strategy over the ST strategy for postoperative ctDNA detection. Abstract : Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is potentially useful for postoperative risk stratification, but its detection is challenging. To examine whether tracking multiple targets improves detection, we analysed paired plasma samples from colorectal cancer patients by tracking one or 16 targets. We observed no difference in postoperative ctDNA detection, concluding that widely available single‐target analyses can provide equally good results for recurrence‐risk stratification. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Molecular oncology. Volume 16:Issue 20(2022)
- Journal:
- Molecular oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 20(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 20 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 20
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0016-0020-0000
- Page Start:
- 3654
- Page End:
- 3665
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-18
- Subjects:
- circulating tumour DNA -- colorectal cancer -- liquid biopsy -- residual disease
Cancer -- Molecular aspects -- Periodicals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.journals.elsevier.com/molecular-oncology/ ↗
http://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1878-0261/issues/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/1878-0261.13294 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1574-7891
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5900.817993
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24391.xml