Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor‐specific anti‐HLA‐Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. Issue 5 (18th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor‐specific anti‐HLA‐Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. Issue 5 (18th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor‐specific anti‐HLA‐Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation
- Authors:
- Visentin, Jonathan
Bachelet, Thomas
Aubert, Olivier
Del Bello, Arnaud
Martinez, Charlie
Jambon, Frédéric
Guidicelli, Gwendaline
Ralazamahaleo, Mamy
Bouthemy, Charlène
Cargou, Marine
Congy‐Jolivet, Nicolas
Nong, Thoa
Lee, Jar‐How
Sberro‐Soussan, Rebecca
Couzi, Lionel
Kamar, Nassim
Legendre, Christophe
Merville, Pierre
Taupin, Jean‐Luc - Abstract:
- Abstract : Anti‐denatured HLA‐Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti‐native HLA‐Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti‐HLA‐Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti‐denatured and anti‐native HLA‐Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA‐Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty‐three (31.6%) were anti‐denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ = 0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ = 0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti‐HLA‐Cw donor‐specific antibodies. Those with anti‐native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody‐mediated rejections ( P = .006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival ( P = .04). Patients with anti‐native HLA‐Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events ( P < .000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti‐native HLA‐Cw eplets ( P = .0001). Anti‐native but not anti‐denatured HLA‐Cw antibodies are deleterious, whichAbstract : Anti‐denatured HLA‐Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti‐native HLA‐Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti‐HLA‐Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti‐denatured and anti‐native HLA‐Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA‐Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty‐three (31.6%) were anti‐denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ = 0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ = 0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti‐HLA‐Cw donor‐specific antibodies. Those with anti‐native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody‐mediated rejections ( P = .006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival ( P = .04). Patients with anti‐native HLA‐Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events ( P < .000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti‐native HLA‐Cw eplets ( P = .0001). Anti‐native but not anti‐denatured HLA‐Cw antibodies are deleterious, which underscores the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA. Abstract : Antinative but not antidenatured HLA‐Cw antibodies are deleterious in kidney transplantation, which underlines the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA as antinative HLA‐Cw antibodies lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results, thus impeding the ability to assess their relevance prior to transplantation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of transplantation. Volume 20:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- American journal of transplantation
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0020-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1365
- Page End:
- 1374
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-18
- Subjects:
- alloantibody -- basic (laboratory) research/science -- clinical research/practice -- crossmatch -- flow cytometry -- histocompatibility -- kidney transplantation/nephrology -- major histocompatibility complex (MHC) -- rejection: antibody‐mediated (ABMR)
Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals
617.95 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-transplantation ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1600-6135&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-6143 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ajt.15766 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1600-6135
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0838.850000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24413.xml