In vitro to in vivo benchmark dose comparisons to inform risk assessment of quantum dot nanomaterials. (19th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weldon, Brittany A.; Griffith, William C.; Workman, Tomomi; Scoville, David K.; Kavanagh, Terrance J.; Faustman, Elaine M.
• Is Part Of: Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Volume 10:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2018-01-19
• Subjects: engineered nanomaterials -- dosimetric assessment -- benchmark dose -- genes x environment -- nanotoxicology -- quantum dots -- in vitro extrapolation; Nanomedicine -- Periodicals; Nanotechnology -- Periodicals; Biotechnology -- Periodicals; Ultrastructure (Biology) -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1507
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1939-5116

Abstract

Abstract : Engineered nanomaterials are currently under review for their potential toxicity; however, their use in consumer/commercial products has continued to outpace risk assessments. In vitro methods may be utilized as tools to improve the efficiency of risk assessment approaches. We propose a framework to compare relationships between previously published in vitro and in vivo toxicity assessments of cadmium‐selenium containing quantum dots (QDs) using benchmark dose (BMD) and dosimetric assessment methods. Although data were limited this approach was useful for identifying sensitive assays and strains. In vitro studies assessed effects of QDs in three pulmonary cell types across two mouse strains. Significant dose–response effects were modeled and a standardized method of BMD analysis was performed as a function of both exposure dose and dosimetric dose. In vivo studies assessed pulmonary effects of QD exposure across eight mouse strains. BMD analysis served as a basis for relative comparison with in vitro studies. We found consistent responses in common endpoints between in vitro and in vivo studies. Strain sensitivity was consistent between in vitro and in vivo studies, showing A/J mice more sensitive to QDs. Cell types were found to differentially take up QDs. Dosimetric adjustments identified similar sensitivity among cell types. Thus, BMD analysis can be used as an effective tool to compare the sensitivity of different strains, cell types, and assays to QDs. These methods allow for in vitro assays to be used to predict in vivo responses, improve the efficiency of in vivo studies, and allow for prioritization of nanomaterial assessments. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine Abstract : Benchmark dose analysis can be used to compare effects of quantum dots in vitro to predict sensitivity of cell types, assays, and strains. Dosimetry was found to be critical for both in vitro and in vivo comparisons.