Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance: Relying on Values or Norms?. (July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Godecharle, Simon; Nemery, Benoit; Dierickx, Kris
• Is Part Of: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics. Volume 9:Number 3(2014)
• Page Start: 79
• Page End: 90
• Publication Date: 2014-07
• Subjects: authorship -- peer review -- publication ethics -- questionable research -- conflicts of interest -- research integrity -- research misconduct -- prevention -- science policy -- guidance; Medical ethics -- Research -- Periodicals; Research -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; 174.205
• DOI: 10.1177/1556264614540594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1556-2646

Abstract

Similar forms of misconduct are perceived differently throughout Europe. There are no extensive surveys on the guidance on research integrity in the different countries of Europe. Therefore, we performed a systematic content analysis of (biomedical) research integrity guidance documents from all the countries of the European Economic Area. We show that there is strong heterogeneity concerning research integrity guidance on crucial aspects, for example, the defining of research misconduct, at both an international and a national level. We also sought to explain why the guidance documents differ by distinguishing the approaches that underlie them. We distinguished a value-based and a norm-based approach, as well as different perspectives on trust. The current confusing situation concerning research integrity guidance hampers international research and possibly wastes research funds. We risk talking past each other, if we do not take the distinction between these underlying approaches into account.