Is Protecting the Healing Ligament Beneficial After Immobilization in External Rotation for an Initial Shoulder Dislocation?. (May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Itoi, Eiji; Hatakeyama, Yuji; Itoigawa, Yoshiaki; Omi, Rei; Shinozaki, Nobuhisa; Yamamoto, Nobuyuki; Sano, Hirotaka
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 41:Number 5(2013)
• Page Start: 1126
• Page End: 1132
• Publication Date: 2013-05
• Subjects: shoulder dislocation -- immobilization -- external rotation -- Bankart lesion -- inferior glenohumeral ligament -- healing; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546513480620
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: Immobilization in external rotation is one of the treatment options for an initial dislocation of the shoulder. However, it remains unclear how long it takes for a Bankart lesion to heal. Hypothesis: Protection of a healing Bankart lesion from stretching would promote the healing process and decrease the recurrence rate after an initial dislocation of the shoulder. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective randomized study. Between January 2005 and August 2009, 109 patients (71 male and 38 female; mean age, 30 years) with an initial traumatic dislocation of the shoulder were enrolled. After 3 weeks of immobilization in external rotation, a shoulder motion restriction band designed to avoid stretching the anteroinferior shoulder capsule was used for 0 weeks (36 patients), 3 weeks (37 patients), or 6 weeks (36 patients). After using the band, patients were allowed to use their shoulders freely, but they were advised to avoid vigorous sport activities for at least 3 months after the injury. Any recurrent dislocation and return to sports were assessed at 2-year follow-up. Results: Of 109 patients, 90 were followed up for 2 years. The compliance rates were 60% to 72% among the groups ( P = .54). The recurrence rate of dislocation was 28% in the 0-week group, 33% in the 3-week group, and 32% in the 6-week group ( P = .88) according to the intention-to-treat analysis, and they were a respective 24%, 28%, and 27% according to the per-protocol analysis ( P = .95). Based on the sport activity level, the recurrence rates for patients involved in contact sports (7/15, 47%) and those involved in noncontact sports (19/51, 37%) were significantly higher than for those not involved in sport activities (2/24, 8.3%) ( P = .0076). Among the 3 groups, there were no significant differences in the recurrence rates. There was no significant difference in the rate of return to sports ( P = .39). Conclusion: No difference in the recurrence rate was seen with the use of a shoulder motion restriction band after 3 weeks of immobilization in external rotation after an initial dislocation of the shoulder.