Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries. Issue 1 (21st October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries. Issue 1 (21st October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries
- Authors:
- Rojnic Kuzman, Martina
Slade, Mike
Puschner, Bernd
Scanferla, Elisabetta
Bajic, Zarko
Courtet, Philippe
Samochowiec, Jerzy
Arango, Celso
Vahip, Simavi
Taube, Maris
Falkai, Peter
Dom, Geert
Izakova, Lubomira
Carpiniello, Bernardo
Bellani, Marcella
Fiorillo, Andrea
Skugarevsky, Oleg
Mihaljevic-Peles, Alma
Telles-Correia, Diogo
Novais, Filipa
Mohr, Pavel
Wancata, Johannes
Hultén, Martin
Chkonia, Eka
Balazs, Judit
Beezhold, Julian
Lien, Lars
Mihajlovic, Goran
Delic, Mirjana
Stoppe, Gabriela
Racetovic, Goran
Babic, Dragan
Mazaliauskiene, Ramune
Cozman, Doina
Hjerrild, Simon
Chihai, Jana
Flannery, William
Melartin, Tarja
Maruta, Nataliya
Soghoyan, Armen
Gorwood, Philip
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: While shared clinical decision-making (SDM) is the preferred approach to decision-making in mental health care, its implementation in everyday clinical practice is still insufficient. The European Psychiatric Association undertook a study aiming to gather data on the clinical decision-making style preferences of psychiatrists working in Europe. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey involving a sample of 751 psychiatrists and psychiatry specialist trainees from 38 European countries in 2021, using the Clinical Decision-Making Style – Staff questionnaire and a set of questions regarding clinicians' expertise, training, and practice. Results: SDM was the preferred decision-making style across all European regions ([central and eastern Europe, CEE], northern and western Europe [NWE], and southern Europe [SE]), with an average of 73% of clinical decisions being rated as SDM. However, we found significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles: participants working in NWE countries more often prefer shared and active decision-making styles rather than passive styles when compared to other European regions, especially to the CEE. Additionally, psychiatry specialist trainees (compared to psychiatrists), those working mainly with outpatients (compared to those working mainly with inpatients) and those working in community mental health services/public services (compared to mixed and private settings) have a significantly lower preferenceAbstract: Background: While shared clinical decision-making (SDM) is the preferred approach to decision-making in mental health care, its implementation in everyday clinical practice is still insufficient. The European Psychiatric Association undertook a study aiming to gather data on the clinical decision-making style preferences of psychiatrists working in Europe. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey involving a sample of 751 psychiatrists and psychiatry specialist trainees from 38 European countries in 2021, using the Clinical Decision-Making Style – Staff questionnaire and a set of questions regarding clinicians' expertise, training, and practice. Results: SDM was the preferred decision-making style across all European regions ([central and eastern Europe, CEE], northern and western Europe [NWE], and southern Europe [SE]), with an average of 73% of clinical decisions being rated as SDM. However, we found significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles: participants working in NWE countries more often prefer shared and active decision-making styles rather than passive styles when compared to other European regions, especially to the CEE. Additionally, psychiatry specialist trainees (compared to psychiatrists), those working mainly with outpatients (compared to those working mainly with inpatients) and those working in community mental health services/public services (compared to mixed and private settings) have a significantly lower preference for passive decision-making style. Conclusions: The preferences for SDM styles among European psychiatrists are generally similar. However, the identified differences in the preferences for non-SDM styles across the regions call for more dialogue and educational efforts to harmonize practice across Europe. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European psychiatry. Volume 65:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- European psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 65:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 65, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 65
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0065-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-21
- Subjects:
- Clinical decision-making -- Europe -- mental health -- professional-patient relations -- psychiatry -- shared decision-making
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Mental illness -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09249338 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09249338 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2330 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0924-9338
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.842700
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24371.xml