An uncertainty hybrid model for risk assessment and prediction of blast-induced rock mass fragmentation. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hosseini, Shahab; Poormirzaee, Rashed; Hajihassani, Mohsen
• Is Part Of: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences. Volume 160(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: Risk assessment -- Rock engineering system -- Z-number -- Fuzzy cognitive map -- Blasting operation -- Rock mass fragmentation; Rock mechanics -- Periodicals; Soil mechanics -- Periodicals; Mining engineering -- Periodicals; Roches, Mécanique des -- Périodiques; Sols, Mécanique des -- Périodiques; Technique minière -- Périodiques; 624.151305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105250
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1365-1609

Abstract

Abstract: Blasting is an important mining operation that usually produce several damaging consequences. Adverse rock fragmentation due to bench blasting is one of them. Hence, analysis of risk level and accurate estimation of particle size distribution of fragment size are of interest. This research developed a new model to simultaneously predict and risk assessment of rock fragmentation using 64 collected data from blasting operated in the Zarshouran gold mine in Iran. In this regard, a newly rock engineering system (RES) is developed based on the reliability information of Z-number theory and causal-effect relationship of the fuzzy cognitive map (FCM). This approach is named the reliability rock engineering causality system (RRECS). To do this, 15 principal effective parameters on rock fragment size were considered in the RRECS modeling process. The uncertainty of the interaction matrix was reduced using Z-number concept. Besides, the weight of effective parameters updated based on the combination of the nonlinear Hebbian algorithm (NLH) and differential evolution algorithm (DE) in FCM. The RRECS performance was validated by statistical linear and non-linear models. The results show R 2, RSME, BIAS, and Accuracy using the proposed RRECS model calculated to be 0.957, 1.956, 0.001, and 96.741 for training and 0.931, 0.996, 0.016, and 99.053 for testing parts, respectively. Therefore, RRECS has performed better than the exponential, power, logarithmic, polynomial, and linear models. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis results revealed that the hole diameter and powder factor parameters have the highest and lowest sensitivity on fragmentation, respectively.