Evaluation of two short standardised regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Issue 10366 (26th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of two short standardised regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Issue 10366 (26th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of two short standardised regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial
- Authors:
- Goodall, Ruth L
Meredith, Sarah K
Nunn, Andrew J
Bayissa, Adamu
Bhatnagar, Anuj K
Bronson, Gay
Chiang, Chen-Yuan
Conradie, Francesca
Gurumurthy, Meera
Kirenga, Bruce
Kiria, Nana
Meressa, Daniel
Moodliar, Ronelle
Narendran, Gopalan
Ngubane, Nosipho
Rassool, Mohammed
Sanders, Karen
Solanki, Rajesh
Squire, S Bertel
Torrea, Gabriela
Tsogt, Bazarragchaa
Tudor, Elena
Van Deun, Armand
Rusen, I D
Adilaa, Oyunchimeg
Alexandru, Sofia
Bellenger, Katharine
Bennet, Jaclyn
Bennet, Deborah
Bindroo, Priyanka
Borisagar, Ghanshyam
Cook, Claire
Dalai, Doljinsuren
Davis, Andrew
de Jong, Bouke
Dodds, Wendy
Duckworth, Lynette
Gahima, Nonhlanhla
Gebreegziabher, Belay
Goldfeld, Anne
Hanifa, Mahmud
Hughes, Gareth
Kimuli, Ivan
Komrska, Jan
Lomtadze, Nino
Murphy, Brendan
Mwelase, Thando
Nalunjogi, Joanitah
Patel, Leena
Pirlog, Irina
Qawiy, Ishmael
Rauchenberger, Mary
Rigouts, Leen
Roach, Carol
Rosu, Laura
Santos-Filho, Ezio
Senguttuvan, Thirumaran
Sisay, Million
Sridhar, Rathinam
Srinivasulu, Vignes
Teferi, Mekonnen
Teklu, Helen
Tsegeen, Narangarav
van Amsterdam, Odette
White, Lisa
Whitney, Johanna
Zagd, Chuluunbaatar
… (more) - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: The STREAM stage 1 trial showed that a 9-month regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis was non-inferior to the 20-month 2011 WHO-recommended regimen. In STREAM stage 2, we aimed to compare two bedaquiline-containing regimens with the 9-month STREAM stage 1 regimen. Methods: We did a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial in 13 hospital clinics in seven countries, in individuals aged 15 years or older with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis without fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resistance. Participants were randomly assigned 1:2:2:2 to the 2011 WHO regimen (terminated early), a 9-month control regimen, a 9-month oral regimen with bedaquiline (primary comparison), or a 6-month regimen with bedaquiline and 8 weeks of second-line injectable. Randomisations were stratified by site, HIV status, and CD4 count. Participants and clinicians were aware of treatment-group assignments, but laboratory staff were masked. The primary outcome was favourable status (negative cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis without a preceding unfavourable outcome) at 76 weeks; any death, bacteriological failure or recurrence, and major treatment change were considered unfavourable outcomes. All comparisons used groups of participants randomly assigned concurrently. For non-inferiority to be shown, the upper boundary of the 95% CI should be less than 10% in both modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analyses, with prespecified tests forSummary: Background: The STREAM stage 1 trial showed that a 9-month regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis was non-inferior to the 20-month 2011 WHO-recommended regimen. In STREAM stage 2, we aimed to compare two bedaquiline-containing regimens with the 9-month STREAM stage 1 regimen. Methods: We did a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial in 13 hospital clinics in seven countries, in individuals aged 15 years or older with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis without fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resistance. Participants were randomly assigned 1:2:2:2 to the 2011 WHO regimen (terminated early), a 9-month control regimen, a 9-month oral regimen with bedaquiline (primary comparison), or a 6-month regimen with bedaquiline and 8 weeks of second-line injectable. Randomisations were stratified by site, HIV status, and CD4 count. Participants and clinicians were aware of treatment-group assignments, but laboratory staff were masked. The primary outcome was favourable status (negative cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis without a preceding unfavourable outcome) at 76 weeks; any death, bacteriological failure or recurrence, and major treatment change were considered unfavourable outcomes. All comparisons used groups of participants randomly assigned concurrently. For non-inferiority to be shown, the upper boundary of the 95% CI should be less than 10% in both modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analyses, with prespecified tests for superiority done if non-inferiority was shown. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN18148631. Findings: Between March 28, 2016, and Jan 28, 2020, 1436 participants were screened and 588 were randomly assigned. Of 517 participants in the mITT population, 133 (71%) of 187 on the control regimen and 162 (83%) of 196 on the oral regimen had a favourable outcome: a difference of 11·0% (95% CI 2·9–19·0), adjusted for HIV status and randomisation protocol (p<0·0001 for non-inferiority). By 76 weeks, 108 (53%) of 202 participants on the control regimen and 106 (50%) of 211 allocated to the oral regimen had an adverse event of grade 3 or 4; five (2%) participants on the control regimen and seven (3%) on the oral regimen had died. Hearing loss (Brock grade 3 or 4) was more frequent in participants on the control regimen than in those on the oral regimen (18 [9%] vs four [2%], p=0·0015). Of 134 participants in the mITT population who were allocated to the 6-month regimen, 122 (91%) had a favourable outcome compared with 87 (69%) of 127 participants randomly assigned concurrently to the control regimen (adjusted difference 22·2%, 95% CI 13·1–31·2); six (4%) of 143 participants on the 6-month regimen had grade 3 or 4 hearing loss. Interpretation: Both bedaquiline-containing regimens, a 9-month oral regimen and a 6-month regimen with 8 weeks of second-line injectable, had superior efficacy compared with a 9-month injectable-containing regimen, with fewer cases of hearing loss. Funding: USAID and Janssen Research & Development. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet. Volume 400:Issue 10366(2022)
- Journal:
- Lancet
- Issue:
- Volume 400:Issue 10366(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 400, Issue 10366 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 400
- Issue:
- 10366
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0400-10366-0000
- Page Start:
- 1858
- Page End:
- 1868
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-26
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine
Medicine
Electronic journals
Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.thelancet.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01406736 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02078-5 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0140-6736
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24373.xml