Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance: taking measurement seriously. Issue 14 (10th October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance: taking measurement seriously. Issue 14 (10th October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance: taking measurement seriously
- Authors:
- Garry, John
Ford, Rob
Johns, Rob - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Freeman et al . (2020a, Psychological Medicine, 21, 1–13) argue that there is widespread support for coronavirus conspiracy theories in England. We hypothesise that their estimates of prevalence are inflated due to a flawed research design. When asking respondents to their survey to agree or disagree with pro-conspiracy statements, they used a biased set of response options: four agree options and only one disagree option (and no 'don't know' option). We also hypothesise that due to these flawed measures, the Freeman et al. approach under -estimates the strength of the correlation between conspiracy beliefs and compliance. Finally, we hypothesise that, due to reliance on bivariate correlations, Freeman et al. over -estimate the causal connection between conspiracy beliefs and compliance. Methods: In a pre-registered study, we conduct an experiment embedded in a survey of a representative sample of 2057 adults in England (fieldwork: 16−19 July 2020). Results: Measured using our advocated 'best practice' approach (balanced response options, with a don't know option), prevalence of support for coronavirus conspiracies is only around five-eighths (62.3%) of that indicated by the Freeman et al. approach. We report mixed results on our correlation and causation hypotheses. Conclusions: To avoid over-estimating prevalence of support for coronavirus conspiracies, we advocate using a balanced rather than imbalanced set of response options, and including a don'tAbstract: Background: Freeman et al . (2020a, Psychological Medicine, 21, 1–13) argue that there is widespread support for coronavirus conspiracy theories in England. We hypothesise that their estimates of prevalence are inflated due to a flawed research design. When asking respondents to their survey to agree or disagree with pro-conspiracy statements, they used a biased set of response options: four agree options and only one disagree option (and no 'don't know' option). We also hypothesise that due to these flawed measures, the Freeman et al. approach under -estimates the strength of the correlation between conspiracy beliefs and compliance. Finally, we hypothesise that, due to reliance on bivariate correlations, Freeman et al. over -estimate the causal connection between conspiracy beliefs and compliance. Methods: In a pre-registered study, we conduct an experiment embedded in a survey of a representative sample of 2057 adults in England (fieldwork: 16−19 July 2020). Results: Measured using our advocated 'best practice' approach (balanced response options, with a don't know option), prevalence of support for coronavirus conspiracies is only around five-eighths (62.3%) of that indicated by the Freeman et al. approach. We report mixed results on our correlation and causation hypotheses. Conclusions: To avoid over-estimating prevalence of support for coronavirus conspiracies, we advocate using a balanced rather than imbalanced set of response options, and including a don't know option. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychological medicine. Volume 52:Issue 14(2022)
- Journal:
- Psychological medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 52:Issue 14(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 52, Issue 14 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 14
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0052-0014-0000
- Page Start:
- 3116
- Page End:
- 3126
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-10
- Subjects:
- Coronavirus conspiracies -- public opinion -- mistrust -- compliance -- survey design
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals
Clinical psychology -- Periodicals
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSM ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/S0033291720005164 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0033-2917
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 24379.xml