Assessing the Combined Public Health Impact of Pharmaceutical Interventions on Pandemic Transmission and Mortality: An Example in SARS CoV‐2. Issue 6 (20th September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessing the Combined Public Health Impact of Pharmaceutical Interventions on Pandemic Transmission and Mortality: An Example in SARS CoV‐2. Issue 6 (20th September 2022)
- Main Title:
- Assessing the Combined Public Health Impact of Pharmaceutical Interventions on Pandemic Transmission and Mortality: An Example in SARS CoV‐2
- Authors:
- Kamal, Mohamed A.
Kuznik, Andreas
Qi, Luyuan
Więcek, Witold
Hussein, Mohamed
Hassan, Hazem E.
Patel, Kashyap
Obadia, Thomas
Toroghi, Masood Khaksar
Conrado, Daniela J.
Al‐Huniti, Nidal
Casciano, Roman
O'Brien, Meagan P.
Barnabas, Ruanne V.
Cohen, Myron S.
Smith, Patrick F. - Abstract:
- Abstract : To assess the combined role of anti‐viral monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines in reducing severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) transmission and mortality in the United States, an agent‐based model was developed that accounted for social contacts, movement/travel, disease progression, and viral shedding. The model was calibrated to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) mortality between October 2020 and April 2021 (aggressive pandemic phase), and projected an extended outlook to estimate mortality during a less aggressive phase (April–August 2021). Simulated scenarios evaluated mAbs for averting infections and deaths in addition to vaccines and aggregated non‐pharmaceutical interventions. Scenarios included mAbs as a treatment of COVID‐19 and for passive immunity for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) during a period when variants were susceptible to the mAbs. Rapid diagnostic testing paired with mAbs was evaluated as an early treatment‐as‐prevention strategy. Sensitivity analyses included increasing mAb supply and vaccine rollout. Allocation of mAbs for use only as PEP averted up to 14% more infections than vaccine alone, and targeting individuals ≥ 65 years averted up to 37% more deaths. Rapid testing for earlier diagnosis and mAb use amplified these benefits. Doubling the mAb supply further reduced infections and mortality. mAbs provided benefits even as proportion of the immunized population increased. Model projections estimated thatAbstract : To assess the combined role of anti‐viral monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines in reducing severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) transmission and mortality in the United States, an agent‐based model was developed that accounted for social contacts, movement/travel, disease progression, and viral shedding. The model was calibrated to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) mortality between October 2020 and April 2021 (aggressive pandemic phase), and projected an extended outlook to estimate mortality during a less aggressive phase (April–August 2021). Simulated scenarios evaluated mAbs for averting infections and deaths in addition to vaccines and aggregated non‐pharmaceutical interventions. Scenarios included mAbs as a treatment of COVID‐19 and for passive immunity for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) during a period when variants were susceptible to the mAbs. Rapid diagnostic testing paired with mAbs was evaluated as an early treatment‐as‐prevention strategy. Sensitivity analyses included increasing mAb supply and vaccine rollout. Allocation of mAbs for use only as PEP averted up to 14% more infections than vaccine alone, and targeting individuals ≥ 65 years averted up to 37% more deaths. Rapid testing for earlier diagnosis and mAb use amplified these benefits. Doubling the mAb supply further reduced infections and mortality. mAbs provided benefits even as proportion of the immunized population increased. Model projections estimated that ~ 42% of expected deaths between April and August 2021 could be averted. Assuming sensitivity to mAbs, their use as early treatment and PEP in addition to vaccines would substantially reduce SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission and mortality even as vaccination increases and mortality decreases. These results provide a template for informing public health policy for future pandemic preparedness. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 112:Issue 6(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics
- Issue:
- Volume 112:Issue 6(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 112, Issue 6 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 112
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0112-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1224
- Page End:
- 1235
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09-20
- Subjects:
- Pharmacology -- Periodicals
Therapeutics -- Periodicals
615.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nature.com/clpt/index.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-6535 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.mosby.com/cpt ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099236 ↗
http://www2.us.elsevierhealth.com/scripts/om.dll/serve?action=searchDB&searchdbfor=home&id=cp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cpt.2728 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9236
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.330000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24377.xml