Artificial Intelligence‐Augmented Pediatric Lung POCUS: A Pilot Study of Novice Learners. (15th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nti, Benjamin; Lehmann, Amalia S.; Haddad, Aida; Kennedy, Sarah K.; Russell, Frances M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 41:Number 12(2022)
• Page Start: 2965
• Page End: 2972
• Publication Date: 2022-04-15
• Subjects: artificial intelligence -- lung -- pediatrics -- ultrasound; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15992
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Respiratory symptoms are among the most common chief complaints of pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) outperforms conventional chest X‐ray and is user‐dependent, which can be challenging to novice ultrasound (US) users. We introduce a novel concept using artificial intelligence (AI)‐enhanced pleural sweep to generate complete panoramic views of the lungs, and then assess its accuracy among novice learners (NLs) to identify pneumonia. Methods: Previously healthy 0‐ to 17‐year‐old patients presenting to a pediatric ED with cardiopulmonary chief complaint were recruited. NLs received a 1‐hour training on traditional lung POCUS and the AI‐assisted software. Two POCUS‐trained experts interpreted the images, which served as the criterion standard. Both expert and learner groups were blinded to each other's interpretation, patient data, and outcomes. Kappa was used to determine agreement between POCUS expert interpretations. Results: Seven NLs, with limited to no prior POCUS experience, completed examinations on 32 patients. The average patient age was 5.53 years (±1.07). The median scan time of 7 minutes (minimum–maximum 3–43; interquartile 8). Three (8.8%) patients were diagnosed with pneumonia by criterion standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for NLs AI‐augmented interpretation were 66.7% (confidence interval [CI] 9.4–99.1%), 96.5% (CI 82.2–99.9%), and 93.7% (CI 79.1–99.2%). The average image quality rating was 2.94 (±0.16) out of 5 across all lung fields. Interrater reliability between expert sonographers was high with a kappa coefficient of 0.8. Conclusion: This study shows that AI‐augmented lung US for diagnosing pneumonia has the potential to increase accuracy and efficiency.