200 Defining Normal: Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping of Benign Lymph Nodes Sampled by Fine Needle Aspiration or Surgical Biopsy. (11th January 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 200 Defining Normal: Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping of Benign Lymph Nodes Sampled by Fine Needle Aspiration or Surgical Biopsy. (11th January 2018)
- Main Title:
- 200 Defining Normal: Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping of Benign Lymph Nodes Sampled by Fine Needle Aspiration or Surgical Biopsy
- Authors:
- Scott, Gregory
Gratzinger, Dita - Abstract:
- Abstract: Large-scale normative data are lacking for benign lymph nodes assessed by flow cytometry immunophenotyping. Initial diagnostics are increasingly moving toward fine needle aspiration (FNA). We used a novel informatics approach to gather large-scale normative data for benign lymph node flow cytometry and compare the performance of flow cytometry immunophenotyping from samples obtained by excisional biopsy vs FNA. We hypothesized that a large normative immunophenotyping dataset will demonstrate comparability between excisional biopsies and FNA flow cytometry immunophenotyping results. Custom text-parsing software was created to extract clinical, diagnostic, and flow cytometry data from 382 consecutive excisional biopsies and 309 consecutive FNAs carrying a benign diagnosis and spanning the last 15 years. Antigens normalized to B- and T-cell content were compared between excisional biopsy and FNAs by t -test corrected for multiple comparisons by false discovery rate. As expected, raw numbers of events were lower in the FNA as compared to the excisional biopsies (86.0% vs 82%). Excisional biopsy vs FNA samples had a significantly lower proportion of events in the monocyte gate (6.5% vs 4.3%). FNAs were enriched for CD3+ T cell events (70.1% vs 59.4%) and with proportionately fewer CD19+ B cells events (23.8% vs 32.7%). Nevertheless, normalized B-cell subsets (eg, %CD19/CD10+, %CD19/CD5+) and T-cell subsets (eg, CD4:CD8 ratio) did not significantly differ betweenAbstract: Large-scale normative data are lacking for benign lymph nodes assessed by flow cytometry immunophenotyping. Initial diagnostics are increasingly moving toward fine needle aspiration (FNA). We used a novel informatics approach to gather large-scale normative data for benign lymph node flow cytometry and compare the performance of flow cytometry immunophenotyping from samples obtained by excisional biopsy vs FNA. We hypothesized that a large normative immunophenotyping dataset will demonstrate comparability between excisional biopsies and FNA flow cytometry immunophenotyping results. Custom text-parsing software was created to extract clinical, diagnostic, and flow cytometry data from 382 consecutive excisional biopsies and 309 consecutive FNAs carrying a benign diagnosis and spanning the last 15 years. Antigens normalized to B- and T-cell content were compared between excisional biopsy and FNAs by t -test corrected for multiple comparisons by false discovery rate. As expected, raw numbers of events were lower in the FNA as compared to the excisional biopsies (86.0% vs 82%). Excisional biopsy vs FNA samples had a significantly lower proportion of events in the monocyte gate (6.5% vs 4.3%). FNAs were enriched for CD3+ T cell events (70.1% vs 59.4%) and with proportionately fewer CD19+ B cells events (23.8% vs 32.7%). Nevertheless, normalized B-cell subsets (eg, %CD19/CD10+, %CD19/CD5+) and T-cell subsets (eg, CD4:CD8 ratio) did not significantly differ between excisional biopsy and FNA specimens with minor exceptions. In conclusion, excisional biopsy and FNA samples differ in overall yield as well as T-cell content, likely due to peripheral blood contamination, but nevertheless produce comparable immunophenotyping results with respect to B- and T-cell subsets in benign lymph nodes. Informatics approaches enlarge normative datasets and in the current study led to the first large-scale quantitative comparison of normative data between different tissue-sampling methods. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of clinical pathology. Volume 149(2018)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- American journal of clinical pathology
- Issue:
- Volume 149(2018)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 149, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 149
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0149-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S85
- Page End:
- S85
- Publication Date:
- 2018-01-11
- Subjects:
- Diagnosis, Laboratory -- Periodicals
Pathology -- Periodicals
616.07 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ajcp.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ajcp/aqx121.199 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-9173
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24364.xml