Psychometric features of brief pain inventory for Parkinson's disease during medication states. Issue 23 (6th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taghizadeh, Ghorban; Martinez-Martin, Pablo; Habibi, Sayed Amir Hasan; Goudarzi, Sepideh; Meimandi, Mahsa; Dehmiyani, Arian; Nodehi, Zahra; Rostami, Siavash; Haji Alizadeh, Naeeme; Mehdizadeh, Maryam
• Is Part Of: Disability and rehabilitation. Volume 44:Issue 23(2022)
• Page Start: 7277
• Page End: 7282
• Publication Date: 2022-11-06
• Subjects: Pain -- Parkinson's disease -- reliability -- validity -- brief pain inventory -- diagnostic accuracy; People with disabilities -- Periodicals; Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 617.03
• DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1977858
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0963-8288

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from different non-motor symptoms, including pain. The present study aimed to measure the psychometric properties of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) in patients with PD during ON- and OFF-states. Methods: We recruited 460 patients with PD and 100 non-PD controls. The pain was assessed by the BPI, King's Parkinson's disease Pain Scale (KPPS), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), Visual Analogue Scale-Pain (VAS-pain), and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in both medication states. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Dimensionality and convergent validity of BPI were also investigated. Diagnostic accuracy and discriminative validity were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: Cronbach's alpha was satisfactory ( α = 0.91–0.97) in both states. The ICC values were 0.85–0.96 in ON- and OFF-state. Factor analysis revealed two factors. A high correlation was obtained between BPI subscales and other scales. AUC >0.91, sensitivity, and specificity> 0.77 were observed for discriminating different pain levels. Furthermore, appropriate diagnostic accuracy was found (AUC, sensitivity, and specificity >0.67) between non-PD control and PD patients. Conclusion: The BPI has acceptable psychometric features as well as diagnostic accuracy for patients with PD. Implications for rehabilitation: Pain as a non-motor symptom in PD can affect daily and social activities. The BPI is used to assess pain severity and interference in activities. For better treatment, pain should be assessed in off-state like to on-state. BPI has satisfactory reliability and validity in different medication states in PD.