Our dynamic being within: Smithian challenges to the new paternalism. Issue 4 (2nd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Matson, Erik W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of economic methodology. Volume 29:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 309
• Page End: 325
• Publication Date: 2022-10-02
• Subjects: Adam Smith -- welfare -- rationality -- preference formation -- behavioral economics -- paternalism; B12 -- D91 -- I31; Economics -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 330.072
• DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2022.2145338
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-178X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This essay uses concepts from Adam Smith's The Theory of Moral Sentiments to develop ideas about choice and welfare. I use those ideas to offer several challenges to common approaches to behavioral welfare economics and new paternalist policy making. Drawing on Smith's dialectical concept of practical reason, which he develops in expositing ideas about self-awareness and self-judgment, I first argue that inconsistency need not be viewed as pathological. Inconsistent choices might indicate legitimate context-dependencies as individuals reflect over disjointed perspectives and act accordingly. Understanding inconsistency as reasonable raises epistemic difficulties for identifying errant choices and designing corrective policies. Second, I draw on Smith's theory of the impartial spectator to discuss dynamic aspects of welfare. Welfare is not simply a matter of preference satisfaction but involves a sense of progress and improvement towards better preferences. Smith's account suggests that economists interested in welfare should focus on institutional arrangements that facilitate self-development.