Reported Exposures Among In-Person Workers With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in 6 States, September 2020–June 2021 . (19th June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reported Exposures Among In-Person Workers With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in 6 States, September 2020–June 2021 . (19th June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Reported Exposures Among In-Person Workers With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in 6 States, September 2020–June 2021
- Authors:
- Free, Hannah
Luckhaupt, Sara E
Billock, Rachael M
Groenewold, Matthew R
Burrer, Sherry
Sweeney, Marie Haring
Wong, Jessie
Gibb, Kathryn
Rodriguez, Andrea
Vergara, Ximena P
Cummings, Kristin J
Lavender, Antionette
Argueta, Gabriel
Crawford, Hannah Leigh
Erukunuakpor, Kimberly
Karlsson, Nicole D
Armenti, Karla
Thomas, Hannah
Gaetz, Kim
Dang, Gialana
Harduar-Morano, Laurel
Modji, Komi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Surveillance systems lack detailed occupational exposure information from workers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health partnered with 6 states to collect information from adults diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection who worked in person (outside the home) in non-healthcare settings during the 2 weeks prior to illness onset. Methods: The survey captured demographic, medical, and occupational characteristics and work- and non–work-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reported close contact with a person known or suspected to have SARS-CoV-2 infection was categorized by setting as exposure at work, exposure outside of work only, or no known exposure/did not know. Frequencies and percentages of exposure types are compared by respondent characteristics and risk factors. Results: Of 1111 respondents, 19.4% reported exposure at work, 23.4% reported exposure outside of work only, and 57.2% reported no known exposure/did not know. Workers in protective service occupations (48.8%) and public administration industries (35.6%) reported exposure at work most often. More than one third (33.7%) of respondents who experienced close contact with ≥10 coworkers per day and 28.8% of respondents who experienced close contact with ≥10 customers/clients per day reported exposures at work. Conclusions: Exposure to occupational SARS-CoV-2 was common among respondents.Abstract: Background: Surveillance systems lack detailed occupational exposure information from workers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health partnered with 6 states to collect information from adults diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection who worked in person (outside the home) in non-healthcare settings during the 2 weeks prior to illness onset. Methods: The survey captured demographic, medical, and occupational characteristics and work- and non–work-related risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reported close contact with a person known or suspected to have SARS-CoV-2 infection was categorized by setting as exposure at work, exposure outside of work only, or no known exposure/did not know. Frequencies and percentages of exposure types are compared by respondent characteristics and risk factors. Results: Of 1111 respondents, 19.4% reported exposure at work, 23.4% reported exposure outside of work only, and 57.2% reported no known exposure/did not know. Workers in protective service occupations (48.8%) and public administration industries (35.6%) reported exposure at work most often. More than one third (33.7%) of respondents who experienced close contact with ≥10 coworkers per day and 28.8% of respondents who experienced close contact with ≥10 customers/clients per day reported exposures at work. Conclusions: Exposure to occupational SARS-CoV-2 was common among respondents. Examining differences in exposures among different worker groups can help identify populations with the greatest need for prevention interventions. The benefits of recording employment characteristics as standard demographic information will remain relevant as new and reemerging public health issues occur. Abstract : Almost one fifth of respondents (19.4%) reported exposure to someone with coronavirus disease 2019 at work. Examining differences in exposures among worker groups by recording occupational characteristics can help identify populations with the greatest need for interventions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 75(2022)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 75(2022)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0075-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- S216
- Page End:
- S224
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-19
- Subjects:
- occupational exposure -- COVID-19 surveillance -- SARS-CoV-2 infection
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciac486 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24365.xml