Motoric cognitive risk syndrome in people with multiple sclerosis: prevalence and correlations with disease-related factors. (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dreyer-Alster, Sapir; Menascu, Shay; Aloni, Roy; Givon, Uri; Dolev, Mark; Achiron, Anat; Kalron, Alon
• Is Part Of: Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. Volume 15(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: cognition -- fatigue -- gait -- MCR syndrome -- multiple sclerosis; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Degeneration -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Nervous System Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Neurodegenerative Diseases -- Periodicals; Système nerveux -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Système nerveux -- Dégénérescence -- Périodiques; Système nerveux; Système nerveux -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques; 616.805
• DOI: 10.1177/17562864221109744
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-2856

Abstract

Background: The motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome, defined as the coexistence of slow gait and subjective cognitive complaints, has as yet not been researched in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Objective: To examine the prevalence of the MCR syndrome in pwMS and its association with disability, disease duration, perceived fatigue, and fear of falling. Methods: The study comprised 618 pwMS [43.7 (SD = 12.6) years, 61.7% females]. Gait speed was measured by the GAITRite™ electronic walkway (CIR Systems, Inc. Haverton, PA, USA). Cognitive status was defined according to the global cognitive score computed by the NeuroTrax™ cognitive battery (NeuroTrax Corporation, Medina, NY, USA). The sample was divided into four main groups: 'normal', 'cognitively impaired', 'gait impaired' or 'MCR'. Perceived fatigue was assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; fear of falling by the Falls Efficacy Scale International. Results: Sixty-three (10.2%) patients were diagnosed with MCR. The percentage of subjects categorized as MCR was 26.0% in severely disabled pwMS compared with 10.9%, 6.0%, and 4.6% in moderately, mildly and very mildly disabled pwMS, respectively. Subjects in the MCR group presented with elevated fatigue compared with patients classified as normal [49.7 (SD = 23.3) vs 26.5 (SD = 19.2), p < 0.001]. Fear of falling was significantly higher in the MCR and gait impairment groups compared with the cognitively impaired and normal groups. Conclusions: The current study corroborates the presence of MCR in pwMS. Nevertheless, future longitudinal research is warranted to better understand its application.