Changing paradigms of hemophilia care across larger specialized treatment centers in the European region. (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Windyga, Jerzy; Boban, Ana; Zupan, Irena; O'Connell, Niamh; Hermans, Cedric
• Is Part Of: Therapeutic advances in hematology. Volume 13(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: Bleeding disorders -- emicizumab -- gene therapy -- hemophilia -- hemophilia treatment centers -- management guidelines -- novel hemophilia therapies -- outcomes -- prophylaxis -- treatment; Hematology -- Periodicals; Hematologic Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1177/20406207221088462
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2040-6207

Abstract

Introduction: In early 2021, the European Collaborative Haemophilia Network (ECHN) conducted a survey to determine whether the paradigms of care across the European region have changed with the introduction of novel therapies for people with hemophilia. Methods: We conducted a survey in 19 ECHN centers from 17 countries in the European region. The aim was to track recent changes in the hemophilia treatment landscape, determine the impact of these changes on hemophilia treatment centers and comprehensive care centers in the region, and to look into the future of care as applied to people with hemophilia. The survey was structured to include three key areas: demographics and organization; current challenges and opportunities; and future directions. Discussion: Our survey provides a snapshot of the current approach to hemophilia treatment that highlights a move toward preventive, rather than reactive care, but that also raises a number of key concerns related to costs and accessibility (particularly as related to novel therapies), time limitations for clinical research, and ongoing issues regarding human resources (particularly in terms of new doctors entering the field) and availability of laboratory resources as the use of novel therapies (some with unique modes of action and unusual adverse events, some with specialized monitoring requirements) becomes commonplace. Conclusion: While our survey suggests that specialized care will continue to play a central role in the management of hemophilia, the standards and protocols, as well as the centers themselves, will have to continue to evolve if they are to continue to provide the highest level of care. To meet this requirement, there is a clear need for engaging, ongoing education programs for healthcare professionals working in the field of hemophilia that can be adjusted to the changing landscape of hemophilia therapy and monitoring.