Direct Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Kilovoltage Switching Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Enhancement in Renal Masses. Issue 6 (23rd November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McGrath, Trevor A.; Ahmad, Faraz; Sathiadoss, Paul; Haroon, Mohammad; McInnes, Matthew DF; Bossuyt, Patrick MM; Schieda, Nicola
• Is Part Of: Journal of computer assisted tomography. Volume 46:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: 862
• Page End: 870
• Publication Date: 2022-11-23
• Subjects: kidney -- cyst -- renal mass -- magnetic resonance imaging -- dual-energy computed tomography; Tomography -- Periodicals; Tomography -- Periodicals; Tomography; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001361
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-8715

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect enhancement in renal masses. Methods: Adults renal masses of 10 mm or greater with both fast kilovoltage potential switching DECT and contrast-enhanced MRI performed within 12 months were retrospectively included. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated for enhancement subjectively (5-point Likert scales) and quantitatively (signal intensity ratio ≥15% for MRI, iodine concentration ≥1.2 or ≥2.0 mg/mL for DECT). Per-lesion diagnostic accuracy, with histologic reference standard for solid masses, was expressed as the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) for each index test. Differences were evaluated for statistical significance using the DeLong test. Results: We included 24 patients with 41 masses: 17 solid renal masses and 24 Bosniak 1 or 2 cysts. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy comparing subjective enhancement by MRI and using iodine overlay DECT for reader 1 (AUC 0.99 vs 0.99, P = 0.38) or reader 2 (AUC 1.00 vs 0.94, P = 0.12) Interobserver agreement was κ = 0.61 for DECT and κ = 0.71 for MRI. There was no significant difference either in accuracy between quantitative assessment using signal intensity ratio or iodine concentration for reader 1 (AUC 0.94 vs 0.94, P = 0.88) or reader 2 (AUC 0.97 vs 0.92, P = 0.16). False-negative results in both subjective and quantitative assessment were nearly exclusively seen in papillary renal cell carcinoma, occurring with both DECT and MRI. Conclusions: We detected no significant differences in accuracy for detecting enhancement in renal masses comparing MRI and DECT. Our results require further investigation in larger sample sizes, but suggest that DECT may be comparable to MRI for detection of enhancement in renal masses.