MO940ACUTE REJECTION IN KIDNEY RETRANSPLANTATION: RISK FACTORS AND IMPACT IN GRAFT SURVIVAL. (29th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leal, Rita; Pardinhas, Clara; Rodrigues, Luís; Guedes Marques, Maria; Santos, Lidia; Romãozinho, Catarina; Caramelo, Francisco; Sá, Helena; Figueiredo, Arnaldo; Alves, Rui
• Is Part Of: Nephrology dialysis transplantation. Volume 36(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-05-29
• Subjects: Nephrology -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Kidneys -- Transplantation -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis; Kidneys -- Transplantation; Nephrology; Periodicals; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab110.0019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0931-0509

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aims: Kidney retransplantation confers a robust survival benefit over dialysis in selected patients and recent data has shown second graft outcomes similar to those of a first graft. However, the management of these patients is challenging, particularly due to allosensitization and an increased risk of acute rejection, which are related with poorer graft survival. The recognition of risk factors to acute rejection, dependent on the first and second graft, might help us to personalize standard care and achieve similar graft survival rates to patients with a first transplant. Our aim was to identify risk factors to second graft acute rejection, and the impact of acute rejection in graft failure. Method: We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study including all patients submitted to a second kidney transplant between January 2008 and December 2019, excluding patients with more than 2 grafts or multi-organ transplant. Demographic, clinical and histocompatibility data from the donor and receptor were collected from our unit database. Delayed graft function was defined as the need of dialysis in the first week post-transplant. All acute rejection episodes were biopsy proven, according to Banff 2017 criteria. Follow-up was defined at 1 st June 2020 for functioning grafts or at graft failure, with a mean time of 94±42 months. Results: We included 109 patients of which 70 males (64%), mostly Caucasian (97%), with a mean age of 43±12 years at second kidney transplant. The main causes of end stage renal disease were glomerular disease (37%), undetermined cause (34%), and urological pathology (15%). First kidney transplant was performed before the year 2010 in 95 patients (87%). The median time of first graft survival was 75 months (IQR 58.5-91.4) and the main causes of first graft loss were chronic allograft nephropathy (N=62, 70.5%) and 11 patients (12.5%) presented primary disfunction due to surgical/vascular complications. During follow-up, 20 patients (18%) presented biopsy proven acute rejection: 3 patients borderline changes, 10 patients T cell mediated and 7 patients antibody mediated, the majority during the first-year post-transplant (N=17, 85%). The risk factors for second graft rejection are summarized in table 1. First year graft survival of the second transplant was 90% and survival at follow up was 72.5% (N=79). Acute rejection was an important risk factor for graft loss (OR 6.548 (95%CI[2.292 - 18.703]), p<0.01). Conclusion: Worst outcomes in first kidney transplant, such as acute rejection, primary dysfunction and lower graft survival were related with an increased risk of acute rejection in second graft outcomes, and consequently a higher risk of graft failure.