Hyperaemic and non-hyperaemic pressure indices of coronary stenosis severity in patients with chronic kidney disease. (3rd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Travieso, A; Mejia-Renteria, H; Jeronimo-Baza, A; Hyun Jung, J; Doh, J H; Nam, C W; Shin, E S; Hoshino, M; Sugiyama, T; Kanaji, Y; Gonzalo, N; Lee, J M; Kakuta, T; Koo, B K; Escaned, J
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 43(2022)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2022-10-03
• Subjects: Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1124
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Evidence regarding the use of pressure indices for the assessment of coronary stenoses in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is scarce. Methods: We assessed the relation between eGFR, FFR and resting Pd/Pa in 1147 consecutive patients (1316 vessels) included in the International Collaboration of Comprehensive Physiologic Assessment Study. We also compared FFR and Pd/Pa against a standardized cut-off of coronary flow reserve (CFR<2.0). Finally, we examined the occurrence of vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO: cardiac death, vessel-specific revascularization, vessel-specific myocardial infarction) across negative/positive results of both FFR and CFR in patients with and without CKD. Results: FFR increases as renal function worsens (beta −10.5, 95% CI −20.0 to −11.03, p=0.030), a relation that was not seen with resting Pd/Pa (beta −6.14, 95% CI −19.9 to 6.78, p=0.351). Both indices had similar diagnostic accuracies for the detection of a CFR<2.0 in the presence of CKD (AUC 0.629 for FFR vs 0.663 for resting Pd/Pa, p=0.192). However, CKD patients showed a higher proportion of vessels with negative FFR but low CFR (24.5% vs 13.4%, p=0.015). CFR decreased linearly with deteriorating eGFR, and this was mainly driven by higher resting coronary flow in CKD patients (p=0.026), while hyperaemic coronary flow remained similar (p=0.403). IMR did not change significantly with eGFR (beta −0.02, 95% −0.09 to 0.05, p=0.557). The incidence of VOCO was higher in patients with CKD and FFR>0.80 when compared to non-CKD patients and FFR>0.80 (12.7% vs 6.90%, p=0.062). Prognosis was worse for those with CKD, negative FFR and CFR<2.0 (20.59% vs. 8.44% in non-CKD, p=0.038). Conclusions: The assessment of a given coronary stenosis in patients with CKD with either FFR or resting Pd/Pa is equivalent when compared to underlying coronary flow. In CKD, impaired CFR is caused by a state of increased resting flow. The assessment of CFR on top of standard pressure wire examination significantly improves prognostic stratification in CKD patients. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.