Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of 'post-Howiesons Poort points' from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. (1st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Timbrell, Lucy; Peña, Paloma de la; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda; Francesco d'Errico, ; Wadley, Lyn; Grove, Matt
• Is Part Of: Quaternary science reviews. Volume 297(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-01
• Subjects: Middle stone age -- Lithic technology -- Outline-based geometric morphometrics -- Chaîne opératoire -- Stone tools; Geology, Stratigraphic -- Quaternary -- Periodicals; Stratigraphie -- Quaternaire -- Périodiques; 551.79
• DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-3791

Abstract

Abstract: Lithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the 'post-Howiesons Poort' or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other well-known phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of 'points' from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2 WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the 'Sibudan' cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes. Highlights: Points from post-Howiesons Poort layers at Border Cave are manufactured via diverse reduction sequences that produce triangular blanks. Technological choices, i.e., knapping modality, orientation of the tip and retouch, influence gross point morphology. Diagnostic Sibudan morphotypes can be distinguished within the Border Cave sample to an extent, despite notable technological differences. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of technology and form provide a nuanced methodology for analysing lithic production strategies.