Characterizing manufacturing sector disruptions with targeted mitigation strategies. (1st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Elimbi Moudio, Marie Pelagie; Bolin, Richard; Carpenter, Alberta; Reese, Samantha Bench; Shehabi, Arman; Rao, Prakash
• Is Part Of: Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability. Volume 2:Number 4(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-01
• Subjects: resilient systems -- risk management -- manufacturing -- disruption mitigation; Human ecology -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; Infrastructure (Economics) -- Periodicals; Economic development -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 333.707
• DOI: 10.1088/2634-4505/ac9c8c
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2634-4505

Abstract

Abstract: It has become clear in recent decades that manufacturing supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to disruptions of varying geographical scales and intensities. These disruptions—whether intentional, accidental, or resulting from natural disasters—cause failures and capacity reductions to manufacturing infrastructure, with lasting effects that can cascade throughout the manufacturing network. An overall lack of understanding of solutions to mitigate disturbances has rendered the challenge of reducing manufacturing supply chain vulnerability even more difficult. Additionally, the variability of disruptions and their impacts complicates policy maker and stakeholder efforts to plan for specific disruptive scenarios. It is necessary to comprehend different kinds of disturbances and group them based on stakeholder-provided metrics to support planning processes and modeling efforts that promote adaptable, resilient manufacturing supply chains. This paper reviews existing methods for risk management in manufacturing supply chains and the economic and environmental impacts of disruptions. In addition, we develop a framework using agglomerative hierarchical clustering to classify disruptions using U.S. manufacturing network data between 2000 and 2021 and characteristic metrics defined in the literature. Our review identifies five groups of disruptions and discusses both general mitigation methods and strategies targeting each identified group. Further, we highlight gaps in the literature related to estimating and including environmental costs in disaster preparedness and mitigation planning. We also discuss the lack of easily available metrics to quantify environmental impacts of disruptions and how such metrics could be included into our methodology.