Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Strain Elastography and Shear Wave Elastography for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. (27th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Park, Eun Joo; Hahn, Seok; Yi, Jisook; Shin, Kyong Jin; Lee, Yedaun; Lee, Ho‐Joon
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 40:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 1011
• Page End: 1021
• Publication Date: 2020-08-27
• Subjects: Carpal tunnel syndrome -- median nerve -- strain elastography -- shear wave elastography; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15478
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance between strain elastography and shear wave elastography (SWE) for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: Between July 2018 and June 2019, 66 consecutive patients with 95 imaged wrists underwent wrist ultrasound, including grayscale ultrasound, strain elastography, and SWE, because of the suspicion of CTS. During wrist ultrasound, the cross‐sectional area (CSA), strain ratio, elasticity, and shear wave velocity of each median nerve were measured at the proximal carpal bone level (scaphoid to pisiform). The variables were compared between the normal and CTS groups by using the independent t test, and subgroup analyses were performed using one‐way analysis of variance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each variable. Results: CSA, elasticity, and shear wave velocity showed significant intergroup differences ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). However, the strain ratio showed no statistically significant intergroup difference ( P = 0.639). In the subgroup analyses, elasticity showed significantly higher values in the severe group than in the mild and moderate groups ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Other parameters showed no significant differences among the different subgroups. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.823 for CSA, 0.772 for elasticity, and 0.779 for shear wave velocity. The differences in the areas under the ROC curve among CSA, elasticity, and shear wave velocity were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: SWE has a good diagnostic value in CTS. In particular, elasticity can discriminate the severe group from the other groups.