Concordance between the BD Onclarity and Roche cobas assays for detection of HPV DNA in a Chinese population. Issue 12 (5th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Yakun; Li, Tingyuan; Yin, Jian; Liu, Yin; Li, Zhifang; Liu, Yujing; Chen, Tingting; Chen, Simiao; Dai, Yu; Cui, Jianfeng; Liu, Bin; Feng, Xiangxian; Zhang, Shaokai; Chen, Wen
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical virology. Volume 94:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 6037
• Page End: 6046
• Publication Date: 2022-09-05
• Subjects: cervical cancer -- cervical intraepithelial neoplasia -- diagnostic test performance -- human papillomavirus -- screening; Virology -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28072
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-6615

Abstract

Abstract: As cervical cancer screening shifts from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, a major issue involves validating more HPV tests. In recent years, some HPV tests are used for clinical performance verification in China. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the BD Onclarity (Becton, Dickinson and Company)HPV assay differs from the Roche cobas (Roche Molecular Systems)HPV assay, as determined using 944 cervical samples, including 588 with sequencing results. In the nucleic acid assay accuracy verification, the assays showed excellent concordance for detection of HPV16 ( κ = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.97) and HPV18 ( κ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.97), and very good concordance for the 12 other high‐risk types (HPV31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, κ = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.83). The overall agreement for HPV DNA detection between Onclarity and cobas was very good ( κ = 0.7755). No difference for ≥CIN2 sensitivity was observed between Onclarity and cobas (both 96.5%), whereas the ≥CIN2 specificity for detection of Onclarity (16.6%, 95% CI: 13.7–19.9) was higher than that of cobas (11.5%, 95% CI: 9.1–14.5). Onclarity exhibited comparable screening performance and triage efficiency compared to cobas in the detection of cervical disease in Chinese women.